SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Tom Nolle
Tom Nolle is the president and founder of CIMI Corporation and the principal consultant/analyst. Tom started his career as a...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Tom Nolle | April 19, 2016 |

 
   

What a Virtual Network Looks Like: Management

What a Virtual Network Looks Like: Management The challenge of virtual network management is you have real stuff that has to be managed and can’t be shown to the user, and stuff the user manages that isn’t real.

The challenge of virtual network management is you have real stuff that has to be managed and can’t be shown to the user, and stuff the user manages that isn’t real.

Virtualization, as we saw in the first article in this series, creates a kind of "service triangle." One apex is the services that are used/purchased, another is the features/functions that create these services, and the third is the resources that support those features/functions. In traditional networking, all three of these are linked into one by device-specific network services. In virtual networking, all three have totally dynamic relationships, and that's what makes management different.

All management starts at the top, so let's start there, with the service user. The user can really only have two possible views of the service: They can see it as a feature collection, which means they see the SLA, or they can see it as a "virtual device." A VPN "looks" like a single huge router, or like a contract, and so a virtual network also looks like one or the other.

It isn't of course, so whatever happens down inside the infrastructure can only be related to the user in terms of SLA parameters or the management features of a virtual device. The user doesn't know, or want to know, about hosting points and middleware and SDN controllers and OpenFlow; none of these are part of their services today. Likely, the service provider doesn't want users meddling down in the real infrastructure either.

portable

That poses the challenge of virtual networking in a management sense; you have real stuff that has to be managed and can't be shown to the user, and stuff the user manages that isn't real. Translating one to the other is perhaps the most important requirement of all for virtual networks.

Management Models

There are two approaches in the market today, and they differ in terms of how the real infrastructure is managed.

The first is the resource management model. This model says that a network is hosted on a collection of shared ("multi-tenant" in cloud terms) resources. If you have an expected amount of services delivered, you can size your resources to support that service quantity at the terms you're selling under. Capacity planning is as old as networking, after all. What you deliver to the user is simply a report of SLA parameter performance, which will be in range if your capacity plan is good and your resources are working. There's no direct correlation needed.

With the resource management model, you ensure you don't oversell your capacity. And if you don't oversell your capacity, then you only need to address the state of the resources, because if they're all working your services have to be working within their SLAs. The Internet is managed this way, and so is most cellular service, so we're all used to the notion. The problem it presents is that if, somehow, you mess up and the capacity doesn't cover the service load, there's often no way to tell what specifically went wrong. A big bank once described the resource-management model as being "on-the-average" service selling because your service would meet your SLA on the average.

The alternative model to address this desire for performance specificity is binding management. A resource or set of resources is bound to a feature/function within a user's service. If that feature/function isn't operating properly then the bound resource has a problem. If that bound resource has a problem then it will impact the features, functions, services, and users bound to it.

The value of binding management is clear, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea. The problem is that the association of resource conditions upward to features and services is difficult when the resources aren't what the user would expect, and it can also be very resource-intensive. Suppose you have a VPN, which is made up of routers (you think) except now you have servers, virtual machines, virtual switches, data center switches, and software elements instead of those routers. When a server fails, when a vSwitch gets congested, what do you tell the user? You have to translate resource conditions into feature and service conditions, and you have to do that for every binding you manage. And you have to do it for every VPN.

If neither resource nor binding management is the right answer, it's not hard to guess that some combination is at least the best answer. The best capacity plans still occasionally go astray. Even if services based on virtual functions can be replaced automatically if a feature or server fails, and even if the number of software instances of a firewall feature can be expanded and contracted with load, there will still be conditions where automatic remediation won't work. This means some limited binding management is still needed to augment your management of the resources.

Analytics seems to be a useful approach to implementing a management view that can accommodate both these models and everything in between. If you assume that all the real management data is collected in some repository, then that data can be extracted to correlate with the bindings, and so create an explicit management connection for every resource you've assigned -- a tight SLA. You can also simply look for SLA data and extract it for reporting, or combine reports of SLA problems with some correlations to resource conditions.

This is a good model because it doesn't dictate market needs, and if agile services are a goal of the network of the future, those needs could change almost daily. Management, in a virtual network, has to be virtualized too!

Follow Tom Nolle on Google+!
Tom Nolle on Google+





COMMENTS




October 24, 2018

With disparate workplaces and ever-expanding volumes of information to manage, the challenges for collaborating effectively are only intensifying. Many critical applications are not integrated, and

October 10, 2018

Businesses are growing across international borders quicker than ever, but scaling operations to follow suit can be a harder, longer process.

This webinar focuses on scaling your next-generat

September 26, 2018

Join Kevin Kieller, Microsoft UC&C expert, along with Ribbon Communications and Polycom, for an update on Microsoft Ignite, and a focus on critical things you need to know about your voice deployme

March 12, 2018
An effective E-911 implementation doesn't just happen; it takes a solid strategy. Tune in for tips from IT expert Irwin Lazar, of Nemertes Research.
March 9, 2018
IT consultant Steve Leaden lays out the whys and how-tos of getting the green light for your convergence strategy.
March 7, 2018
In advance of his speech tech tutorial at EC18, communications analyst Jon Arnold explores what voice means in a post-PBX world.
February 28, 2018
Voice engagement isn't about a simple phone call any longer, but rather a conversational experience that crosses from one channel to the next, as Daniel Hong, a VP and research director with Forrester....
February 16, 2018
What trends and technologies should you be up on for your contact center? Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center & Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2018, gives us the lowdown.
February 9, 2018
Melanie Turek, VP of connected work research at Frost & Sullivan, walks us through key components -- and sticking points -- of customer-oriented digital transformation projects.
February 2, 2018
UC consultant Marty Parker has crunched lots of numbers evaluating UC options; tune in for what he's learned and tips for your own analysis.
January 26, 2018
Don't miss out on the fun! Organizer Alan Quayle shares details of his pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon, TADHack-mini '18, showcasing programmable communications.
December 20, 2017
Kevin Kieller, partner with enableUC, provides advice on how to move forward with your Skype for Business and Teams deployments.
December 20, 2017
Zeus Kerravala, principal analyst with ZK Research, shares his perspective on artificial intelligence and the future of team collaboration.
December 20, 2017
Delanda Coleman, Microsoft senior marketing manager, explains the Teams vision and shares use case examples.
November 30, 2017
With a ruling on the FCC's proposed order to dismantle the Open Internet Order expected this month, communications technology attorney Martha Buyer walks us through what's at stake.
October 23, 2017
Wondering which Office 365 collaboration tool to use when? Get quick pointers from CBT Nuggets instructor Simona Millham.
September 22, 2017
In this podcast, we explore the future of work with Robert Brown, AVP of the Cognizant Center for the Future of Work, who helps us answer the question, "What do we do when machines do everything?"
September 8, 2017
Greg Collins, a technology analyst and strategist with Exact Ventures, delivers a status report on 5G implementation plans and tells enterprises why they shouldn't wait to move ahead on potential use ....
August 25, 2017
Find out what business considerations are driving the SIP trunking market today, and learn a bit about how satisfied enterprises are with their providers. We talk with John Malone, president of The Ea....
August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.