SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Kevin Kieller
Kevin Kieller is a partner with enableUC, a company that helps measure, monitor and improve UC and collaboration usage and...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Kevin Kieller | March 17, 2015 |

 
   

Why Your RFP Is A Request for Problems

Why Your RFP Is A Request for Problems Instead of helping move toward a solution, the time and effort dedicated to the RFP process creates both internal and external conflict.

Instead of helping move toward a solution, the time and effort dedicated to the RFP process creates both internal and external conflict.

I have never been an advocate of the Request for Proposal (RFP) process. The concept seems valid: send the description of your needs to multiple providers and then select the provider offering the best solution. Unfortunately, in the world of unified communications and collaboration, many organizations end up more confused at the end of the RFP process. Instead of helping move toward a solution, the time and effort dedicated to the RFP process creates both internal and external conflict -- and your RFP becomes a "request for problems".

There are several factors that can cause the RFP process to fail:

1. Your requirements are not clear.
Unfortunately in the world of UC and Collaboration, few organizations have documented and prioritized measurable business requirements. This often means vague requirements are included in RFP documents, creating a lose-lose situation. Clients aren't sure what they want, and consequently, respondents aren't sure what to propose. However, propose they must, and as such the responses typically suggest specific features and solutions regardless of the requirements. Responses become more about what can be "sold" as opposed to what is actually needed.

Phrases in RFPs such as "complete integration with x" or "full mobile support" or "support for Microsoft Outlook" -- unless explained in more detail seldom serve as valid solution criteria.

If you cannot clearly explain what you need, please do not issue an RFP; it will waste everyone's time.

2. A fancy template that hides unclear requirements.
Some organizations "borrow" (cut and paste) fancy, legalistic RFP templates that add structure to an RFP document, but this does little to make up for vague or undefined requirements.

I would argue that using a bombastic template often fools people within your own organization, they erroneously assume that you actually have a good handle on the solution requirements simply because the RFP document is 50 pages in length and it has impressive heft. They don't realize that 49 of the pages are boilerplate text and only one page, containing a handful of vague bullet points, describes your specific requirements.

You can fool some of the people some of the time; but all of the time, you can make people's eyes glaze over if you begin an RFP with ten or more pages of legal jargon.

3. Organizations abdicate decision making.
Issuing an RFP is a terrible way to decide if you want an on-premises or hosted solution. Likewise an RFP is not an effective way to decide between Cisco and Microsoft UC. Important strategic decisions should be made ahead of issuing an RFP-based on your specific business objectives and organizational situation.

If you hire a consultant to help evaluate alternatives, they work very hard to try and accurately compare the options. A consultant should ensure that different cost models include or exclude similar items; a balanced comparison ensures licensing, usage/consumption assumptions and redundancy and resiliency parameters are similar across the solutions being compared.

In contrast, respondents to RFPs are solely driven to make their proposed solution appear better and more economical. In responding to an RFP, instead of trying to include all of the potential costs, any costs that can be excluded will be, in order to make a solution appear more attractive. Additional networking costs associated with hosted solutions or the need for additional real-time traffic prioritization are often (un)intentionally excluded from RFP responses.

4. The RFP process is inherently divisive.
If you are looking to continue or build a true partner relationship with a company, then an RFP is almost always a poor way to proceed.

The RFP process is inherently confrontational, causing organizations to ask for long lists of features, many of which are not actually required, going so far as to denote many unneeded features as "mandatory." Respondents then over-promise, answering "yes" or "complies" to all mandatory features (they don't really have a choice) while simultaneously trying to include the most minimal of actual costs. Many respondents figure they will sort out the pricing details (i.e. add in items or clearly exclude services) during the contract negotiations, once they are selected as the preferred vendor.

5. You punish the incumbent.
If someone has been managing your existing network, voice, or UC environment, chances are they know a few things about how your organization operates. Given this, evaluate carefully pricing and timeline differences between the incumbent and other respondents. Don't punish the incumbent simply because they are providing the most accurate timelines and pricing based on their more detailed understanding of your requirements and environment.

Transitioning from an existing provider to a new provider will always increase risk and potentially incur unexpected costs. Similarly, transitioning from an on-premises solution to a hosted solution often introduces unanticipated risk and cost. Major changes in platform require additional end-user and support staff training. Make sure you add budget and timeline contingency to transitional responses.

Making Your RFP Better
As noted above, organizations can sabotage their own RFP process in many different and creative ways. Here are six things you can do to improve the RFP process:

  1. Be very clear on your specific requirements. If you are not sure what you need, you are not ready to issue an RFP.

  2. Only denote as mandatory attributes and features that are truly "make or break". If there is debate around whether an item should be mandatory then you have more internal work to do before issuing the RFP.

  3. Make strategic choices before you issue an RFP: hosted versus on-premises, Cisco versus Microsoft, etc.

  4. Only ask for features you know you need. Don't be tempted to include a request for features "you might need." If you are unclear on which features are required, again, you should not be issuing an RFP.

  5. Communicate actual timelines. Asking for an implementation date earlier than required may cause respondents to increase cost estimates; however, if the actual implementation takes longer, because delays on your side, vendors may be justified in billing you more.

  6. Make sure you have documented and prioritized your specific business objectives associated with the project. If the evaluation team is not clear on whether price, security, risk mitigation or user experience are most important then you are not ready to issue an RFP.

Conclusion
Some organizations issue RFPs because governance requires them to do so. Other organizations issue RFPs because they believe this helps them procure a solution at the lowest price. Still others think an RFP will help them better understand the market choices. I would suggest that for organizations who have a choice, if you truly have quantified the business benefit a UC solution will provide, and you should, consider negotiating with a strong provider of this solution, perhaps an incumbent. As long as the total incurred costs are less than the provided business benefit you will have a positive return on investment. And a positive ROI is a fantastic demonstration of project success.

RFPs work well for commodity or near-commodity items. Need office chairs? Then issue an RFP. However, in the complex and quickly evolving world of UC and collaboration, an ill-conceived RFP may yield more problems than solutions.

Has the RFP process worked well for you? Has the RFP process left you more confused? Please comment below, connect with me on LinkedIn and send tweets telling me where I went wrong to @kkieller.





COMMENTS




April 25, 2018

Yesterdays simple phone call to a contact center or business location is rapidly becoming todays interactive session, spanning multiple channels and devices. If you need to know how Omnichannel can

March 7, 2018

Video collaboration is experiencing significant change and innovation-how can your enterprise take advantage? In this webinar, leading industry analyst Ira Weinstein will present detailed analysis

February 21, 2018

Business agility has become the strongest driver for enterprises to begin migrating their communications to the cloud-and its a benefit that enterprises are already realizing. To gain this benefit

March 12, 2018
An effective E-911 implementation doesn't just happen; it takes a solid strategy. Tune in for tips from IT expert Irwin Lazar, of Nemertes Research.
March 9, 2018
IT consultant Steve Leaden lays out the whys and how-tos of getting the green light for your convergence strategy.
March 7, 2018
In advance of his speech tech tutorial at EC18, communications analyst Jon Arnold explores what voice means in a post-PBX world.
February 28, 2018
Voice engagement isn't about a simple phone call any longer, but rather a conversational experience that crosses from one channel to the next, as Daniel Hong, a VP and research director with Forrester....
February 16, 2018
What trends and technologies should you be up on for your contact center? Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center & Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2018, gives us the lowdown.
February 9, 2018
Melanie Turek, VP of connected work research at Frost & Sullivan, walks us through key components -- and sticking points -- of customer-oriented digital transformation projects.
February 2, 2018
UC consultant Marty Parker has crunched lots of numbers evaluating UC options; tune in for what he's learned and tips for your own analysis.
January 26, 2018
Don't miss out on the fun! Organizer Alan Quayle shares details of his pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon, TADHack-mini '18, showcasing programmable communications.
December 20, 2017
Kevin Kieller, partner with enableUC, provides advice on how to move forward with your Skype for Business and Teams deployments.
December 20, 2017
Zeus Kerravala, principal analyst with ZK Research, shares his perspective on artificial intelligence and the future of team collaboration.
December 20, 2017
Delanda Coleman, Microsoft senior marketing manager, explains the Teams vision and shares use case examples.
November 30, 2017
With a ruling on the FCC's proposed order to dismantle the Open Internet Order expected this month, communications technology attorney Martha Buyer walks us through what's at stake.
October 23, 2017
Wondering which Office 365 collaboration tool to use when? Get quick pointers from CBT Nuggets instructor Simona Millham.
September 22, 2017
In this podcast, we explore the future of work with Robert Brown, AVP of the Cognizant Center for the Future of Work, who helps us answer the question, "What do we do when machines do everything?"
September 8, 2017
Greg Collins, a technology analyst and strategist with Exact Ventures, delivers a status report on 5G implementation plans and tells enterprises why they shouldn't wait to move ahead on potential use ....
August 25, 2017
Find out what business considerations are driving the SIP trunking market today, and learn a bit about how satisfied enterprises are with their providers. We talk with John Malone, president of The Ea....
August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.