SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Tom Brannen
Tom Brannen is the President of Wassaw Consulting LLC, an independent consulting firm based in Atlanta. With 20 years of...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Tom Brannen | December 14, 2016 |

 
   

Move Over RFP -- Make Way for the New Model

Move Over RFP -- Make Way for the New Model Communications manufacturer upheaval and evolving enterprise requirements are putting the RFP out of fashion.

Communications manufacturer upheaval and evolving enterprise requirements are putting the RFP out of fashion.

portable

These are not easy times for healthcare CIOs. On top of the dozens of other major projects on their slate, their aging PBXs that are ticking away are now ticking louder. And not the ticking of a fine-tuned machine, but the ticking of the clock as it begins the countdown to the great recycling center in the sky (better known as eBay).

In the old days (say a few years ago) you would hire a consultant to write an RFP, throw it on the street, rate the proposals (probably go with the cheapest), and move on. While that is a bit simplistic, this is pretty much how business has been done for decades. But things are changing fast and the old models are breaking down for two key reasons: manufacturer upheaval and evolving requirements.

Manufacturer Upheaval

The giants of the telecommunications business -- the companies that invented the industry and ruled the communications world for more than a century -- are pretty much all gone. While their technologies live on through other names and acquisitions, the companies themselves are no longer with us.

In research I pulled together with my colleague Beth English for the locknote presentation at the SCTC conference a few months ago, I calculated that the bedrock companies around the world that we are used to working with are out of business after an average company lifespan of 140 years.

The old healthcare players are no longer there; Nortel is long gone. Siemens, which lives on as Unify now owned by Atos, is going through reinvention and transition. Avaya (along with Nortel blue) has been a long-time standard in healthcare, but is now focusing on restructuring, spinoffs, and bankruptcy.

Mitel and Shoretel are potentially strong competitors in this space, though neither has a legacy of leadership in the healthcare vertical. (Yes, I know they are both very competitive in healthcare and have a lot of wins to prove it; but they aren't known as true market leaders.) At a recent Mitel consultant and analyst briefing, it was clear the company intends to push forward into healthcare, which is a good sign for an industry that needs new ideas and alternatives.

It will be interesting to see if the steady-as-she-goes NEC is able to grow in this market as well. Healthcare has always been an important vertical market to the company and it might very well be able to grow in this space.

As consultants, we must strongly encourage our clients to take a harder look at these players than they might have in the past, as the winning solutions may come from someone other than the traditionally strong healthcare manufacturers.

As for Cisco, it seems to be extremely well positioned to grow market share in the healthcare market as the aging PBXs begin to finally kick the bucket. Looking back, it's funny how many hospitals were initially afraid of Cisco when it entered the market with its "risky" VoIP products and had many telecom managers freaking out over concerns of security, reliability, and quality. Fast forward 10 years and now Cisco is the conservative play. It is a proven market leader, has tons of healthcare experience, is not going to be acquired any time soon, and isn't going through a bankruptcy. And while its long-term future will be determined by the bets it's placing today, Cisco is firmly positioned in the short term to be in a very strong position for years to come.

"But what about Microsoft?" you might be saying. "And how could you not be talking about the cloud?" The conservative culture pervasive in healthcare just leaves too many folks uncomfortable with less traditional offerings. And while this is often driven from a place of necessity, to flat out dismiss alternative offerings from the get-go is to potentially miss out on the best solutions. The truth is it's hard to justify something new when it is hard to find other comparable institutions that have made the jump and lived to tell the story.

portable


Evolving Requirements

In the past, requirements were fairly static, and the RFP process often focused on how many of the eight or so applications were needed and in what quantity. Again, a bit of an oversimplification, but not that far removed from reality.

Today, the requirements are much more complex, with some of the biggest items relating to integration with other systems. The rub here is that the requirements get to be so specific that it is hard to generalize them such that a generic RFP can be issued. I see us moving more and more away from a traditional RFP process and more toward a partner selection model where the details are ironed out after a direction is decided.

This can be a more labor intensive process, but it is significantly more strategic than the older paradigm. It can be much more focused on high-level objectives and improving business processes and less focused on comparing UC bundles and phone features.

The key will be who you have driving the decisions. Do your decision-makers have the real-world experience AND the big-picture vision to guide your business in the right direction? Do they approach the problem from a completely independent and unbiased perspective to objectively evaluate all available options? Do they have the time to dedicate to the processes of gathering requirements, researching alternatives, dreaming of the future, and hammering down a roadmap to move your organization forward?

I can't think of a more challenging time in my 22 years in the business, especially in healthcare. With the massive disruption in the industry, combined with the more complicated nature of requirements, there is the potential for colossal and costly mistakes. Yet, there is also the potential to really make meaningful change.

"SCTC Perspectives" is written by members of the Society of Communications Technology Consultants, an international organization of independent information and communications technology professionals serving clients in all business sectors and government worldwide.





COMMENTS



May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

April 19, 2017

Now more than ever, enterprise contact centers have a unique opportunity to lead the way towards complete, digital transformation. Moving your contact center to the cloud is a starting point, quick

April 5, 2017

Its no secret that the cloud offers significant benefits to enterprises - including cost reduction, scalability, higher efficiency, and more flexibility. If your phone system and contact center are

June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.