SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Kevin Kieller
Kevin Kieller is a partner with enableUC, a company that helps measure, monitor and improve UC and collaboration usage and...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Kevin Kieller | February 22, 2016 |

 
   

Success with Skype: How to Evaluate Your Options

Success with Skype: How to Evaluate Your Options Not only do you need to determine the best features for your enterprise, but also build consensus around the choices.

Not only do you need to determine the best features for your enterprise, but also build consensus around the choices.

As I mentioned in my recent post, "Success With Skype: Knowing What You Need," in the last year Microsoft has loaded up Skype for Business, nee Lync, with many changes, improvements, and significant new options. While having more choices is good, it does make for more complicated evaluations. In order to move forward efficiently, you need a process for evaluating all the available options and making a recommendation as to which are best for your organization.

In this second article in my "Success With Skype" series leading up to Enterprise Connect, coming March 7 to 10 in Orlando, Fla., I will give you a strategy on how to evaluate your options. If you are planning to attend Enterprise Connect, consider this and the other articles in this series as pre-reads to help you get the most from my session, "Succeeding with Skype for Business: Decoding the Cloud, Licensing, and Hybrid Options." If you are unable to attend Enterprise Connect, these articles should help improve your chance of success.

Evaluating Your Options
Once you have defined and documented the objectives of your UC program, you then need to evaluate the available options in order to determine the best fit for your specific organization.

To be successful, the evaluation process needs to fulfill two key goals:

  1. Determine a good solution choice
  2. Build consensus around the choice

Note that I intentionally focus on finding a "good" solution as opposed to identifying the "best" solution. A good solution is one that has a high probability of delivering on your documented business objectives. Keep in mind that the value a solution delivers is based on choosing wisely and executing well. Often you won't have enough information during the evaluation phase to rank one good solution better than another good solution. In these cases, it is more important to identify the multiple solutions that would meet your business objectives than to try and figure out the absolute best solution; you may have multiple paths to success -- and this is a good thing.

Building consensus through the process is necessary if you hope to have the traction necessary for moving forward with the solution choice. Organizations that fail to gain cross-departmental consensus often make recommendations but fail to implement any solutions; sadly, they seem to repeat this process year after year.

I have had a high degree of success facilitating a transparent "pros and cons" process in order to achieve both evaluation goals. I use a template that looks something like this:

The evaluation process proceeds as follows:

1. Identify several viable solution alternatives (these are inserted in the columns).
I typically evaluate between three and eight options. More than this is unwieldy. If you evaluate fewer options, someone may question your thoroughness. I regularly include "status quo" as an option; exploring whether to keep things the same often helps uncover pain points with the current state and can crystallize potential benefits associated with new options.

The options you evaluate can be solutions from different vendors or different flavors of one solution. For example, evaluating on-premises Skype for Business versus Microsoft-hosted Skype for Business versus Skype for Business hosted by a third-party provider is frequently relevant. Options could also be different integrations -- for example, Microsoft + Cisco via SIP or Microsoft + Cisco via "call via work" or Microsoft + Cisco using CUCILync. (Off topic: I have not seen good success with many of these multivendor mash-ups.)

I typically enforce a rule that only available options be evaluated. Evaluating the next version is problematic because most vendors claim the N+1 version will fix all existing deficiencies and in reality this is rarely the case.

2. For each option, focus on material differences, where one solution is decidedly better or worse in a particular area.
Depending on the comparison and the business objectives, I may add different evaluation criteria as rows. For instance, if cost savings was a key project objective, I would add a row labeled "Cost savings" and then evaluate each option. These evaluations could be quantified (for instance, Option 1 will save $1 million over five years and Option 2 will save $1.5 million) or relative (option 2 is expected to save 50% more over five years). If all options are expected to save a substantially similar amount of money, then do not list savings as the difference as it is not materially a pro or con for any solution.

Examples of specific criteria I have used in the past include:

  • Level of internal expertise with solution
  • Estimated total cost of ownership (TCO) over five years
  • Speed of implementation
  • Support for Apple laptops (many executives at one organization used Macs)
  • Ease of use
  • Ease of administration
  • Support for remote users
  • Multilingual support
  • Alignment with solutions used by key partners and suppliers

(To re-emphasize, you need to align the evaluation criteria with your business objectives!)

Avoid listing features that all solutions possess. The template is meant to identify differences. Every pro can be stated as a con. It is not necessary to list a "pro" for option 2 as "less expensive" and a con for option 1 as "more expensive." In general, cons are often more important to identify than pros.

3. Review and discuss the pros/cons with a wide variety of team members.
Encourage debate and discussion and be open to adding new pros or cons, respecting the rules above.

These discussions are often where team members develop a better understanding of the various options and where consensus emerges. It is OK if you need to agree to disagree. For instance, if you can't reach consensus on which solution is easier to use, either you can omit this as a difference, or you can flag a couple of options as "Potentially easier to use." This serves to visibly document a point of non-agreement.

4. When the team is convinced you have captured all the material pros and cons, look for the solution that has more positive rankings, or fewer negative rankings.
Often a single solution bubbles to the top.

Ideally the team should vote on the options with the goal of identifying one as the team's recommended choice. Occasionally, when you have no clear winner, you might need to flag two options as "Recommended."

Special cases include a situation in which no option is notably better than the status quo. In this case, you need to do more research before proceeding on your UC journey. Similarly, if all options are rated equally, then you likely have more work to do. Sometimes each option would provide you with measurable business benefits; however, it is unusual for three of four options to be equally rated; normally this is an indication that you will need to undertake further analysis and debate.

I use the above process to help select a solutions platform, and then continue to use it to evaluate and build consensus related to supplemental choices, such as headset or desk phone selections.

Evaluating your solution options using a methodical and transparent process aligned with your business objectives helps drive UC projects forward. Building consensus during the evaluation process will help assemble a team that is more likely to implement and execute well.

For more insight on how to succeed with Skype for Business, please consider this a personal invitation to join me at Enterprise Connect 2016 when I host the "Succeeding with Skype for Business: Decoding the Cloud, Licensing, and Hybrid Options" session on Tuesday, March 8, at 1:30 p.m. Register now using the code NJPOST to receive $200 off the current conference price.

And, watch for my next article in this series, coming soon, on how to assemble an implementation team that can succeed.

Follow Kevin Kieller on Twitter and Google+!
@kkieller
Kevin Kieller on Google+





COMMENTS



August 16, 2017

Contact centers have long been at the leading edge of innovation in communications technology, given their promise of measurable ROI and the continual need to optimize customer interactions and sta

July 12, 2017

Enterprises have been migrating Unified Communications & Collaboration applications to datacenters - private clouds - for the past few years. With this move comes the opportunity to leverage da

May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.