Martha Buyer
Martha Buyer is an attorney whose practice is limited to the practice of telecommunications law. In this capacity, she has...
Read Full Bio >>

Martha Buyer | February 18, 2016 |


Information Security: The Safe Harbor Is No Longer Safe

Information Security: The Safe Harbor Is No Longer Safe Current knowledge of obligations will certainly make the difference between maintaining an EU-client relationship and losing it.

Current knowledge of obligations will certainly make the difference between maintaining an EU-client relationship and losing it.

This article is a follow-up to the previously published, "Information Security: The New IT (or "it") Issue -- Part 1."

Context is incredibly important in all things. As I have been preparing for a conversation about information security and privacy at a major international event, I decided that by means of introduction, I should come up with a (totally unscientific) list of people who have changed the contemporary world. Other than leaving off mass murderers and war criminals, I was open to just about anyone, and that's what I got. Although the list is long, some obvious choices were, in no particular order, Bill, Steve, Andy, Gordon and Sergey and Larry (no last names needed). Among the less traditional choices were David Bowie, Billie Jean King, Magic Johnson, Robert Oppenheimer, the Pope and Elvis. If nothing else, it's been a very interesting exercise.

The point of gathering this information has been to put in context the person who has had a dramatic effect on the world with respect to information security and privacy. Like it or not, Edward Snowden has changed the world. Whether you agree with his actions or not, he has -- and will continue to -- have a significant impact on all of us, both personally and professionally, particularly where technology continues to enable entities to reach more deeply into our personal lives than has ever before been considered, let alone possible.

In the first part of this series, I presented information that was focused more intensely on the domestic side of this issue. That is, how American entities need to consider the data that they have in order to fully manage it. In this part, we'll look at least a bit more globally, with particular attention to the relationship between the U.S. and EU with respect to information security. The decision in Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner has already had an impact for those entities that both intentionally and unintentionally transfer data across the Atlantic to the U.S. as a result of using the cloud for storage and/or processing.

Before digging into what this decision means technically, it's important to consider a critical distinction between the U.S. and European Union with respect to privacy. In the U.S., individuals and businesses consider privacy a matter of commerce. It's not that Americans don't care about the security of their personal data, but rather that they rely on the institutions with which they share this information and themselves to keep what's private, private. In the E.U., however, privacy is considered a fundamental right. In fact, to quote from the statement made by the Court of Justice of the European Union, "...legislation permitting public authorities to have access on a generalised (sic) basis to the content of electronic communications must be regarded as compromising the essence of the fundamental right to respect for private life." It is essential to understand this vastly different standard when considering the post-Schrems environment.

One other thing: With cloud computing in general, one of the challenges is the question of where the data actually is. Following this decision, the location of the cloud matters more than ever. Once data leaves the European Union's borders for the U.S., the Schrems decision, and the rules that will follow, become crucially important. As such, it's important, particularly for EU entities to know where the cloud they are using is. It matters!

The Case

Austrian Maximillian Schrems brought suit in an Irish court following the disclosures made by Edward Snowden. Specifically, Schrems claimed that the U.S. did not offer sufficient protection from U.S. surveillance for data that was transferred from an EU location (in this case, Ireland) to the U.S. Specifically, Schrems claimed that the information that he provided to Facebook was stored at Facebook's Irish subsidiary, and some -- or all -- of his data was then transferred to other Facebook servers in the U.S. for processing. No one disputes these facts.

In 2000, the EU adopted its "Safe Harbor" decision, which enabled U.S. companies to self-certify that their own internal company practices ensured a sufficient level of protection for data coming from the EU to the U.S., under the terms of the EU Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC. This EU's Safe Harbor was effective until this past October, when the EU Advocate-General determined that the protections provided by it were insufficient. Further, in its opinion, the court determined in a potential conflict of laws case that while an EU court made this decision, individual court members (i.e. EU member countries) have power, independent of the EU, to not only investigate claims about the level of data protection between respective EU countries and the U.S., but to suspend data transfers if, on an individual and not collective basis, each determines that the U.S. doesn't provide a sufficient level of protection of private information.

Key take-aways are:

  1. Many EU-based companies utilize U.S.-based cloud services. As such, although an entity may assume that its company keeps all personal data outside of U.S. jurisdiction, it is now time to verify and then take steps to secure that information, as necessary.
  2. These same entities can no longer rely on Safe Harbor self-certification.
  3. Entities need to independently verify that company transfers of personal data from the EU to the United States meet the level of data privacy protection considered adequate by the EU Data Protection Directive.
  4. The European Commission has recommended that companies consider using the EU-approved standard contractual clauses, the EU-approved Binding Corporate Rules, or the enumerated derogations under which data can be transferred. This information can be found here.) There are two sets of standard contractual clauses for transfers from data controllers to data controllers established outside the EU/EEA and one set for the transfer to processors established outside the EU/EEA.

Loss of safe harbor protection could be a deal breaker for entities that process and store data coming from the European Union. These changes will -- and have had -- a significant impact on cloud-based businesses where processing is handled stateside. If you have questions or concerns, now is the time to learn the new rules. They're continuing to evolve, but current knowledge of obligations will certainly make the difference between maintaining an EU-client relationship and losing it.

Learn more about management and security trends and technologies at Enterprise Connect 2016, March 7 to 10, in Orlando, Fla. View the Management and Security track sessions; register now using the code NJPOST to receive $200 off the current conference price.


Enterprise Connect Orlando 2018
March 12-15 | Orlando, FL

Connect with the Entire Enterprise Communications & Collaboration Ecosystem

Stay Up-to-Date: Hear industry visionaries in Keynotes and General Sessions delivering the latest insight on UC, mobility, collaboration and cloud

Grow Your Network: Connect with the largest gathering of enterprise IT and business leaders and influencers

Learn From Industry Leaders: Attend a full range of Conference Sessions, Free Programs and Special Events

Evaluate All Your Options: Engage with 190+ of the leading equipment, software and service providers

Have Fun! Mingle with sponsors, exhibitors, attendees, guest speakers and industry players during evening receptions

Register now with code NOJITTEREB to save $200 Off Advance Rates or get a FREE Expo Pass!

December 13, 2017

The two major vendors in the Unified Communications space, Cisco and Microsoft, are both strongly promoting their cloud UC deployments. If cloud UC is on your enterprises roadmap, but you dont want

November 29, 2017

As video conferencing use rises in the enterprise, businesses are looking for ways to bring this technology out of traditional conference room and make it more broadly accessible. That's made the h

November 1, 2017

Your customers (internal and external) demand that you offer them the ability to connect by any means. With the adoption of cloud communications tools you now have access to an expanded portfolio o

November 30, 2017
With a ruling on the FCC's proposed order to dismantle the Open Internet Order expected this month, communications technology attorney Martha Buyer walks us through what's at stake.
October 23, 2017
Wondering which Office 365 collaboration tool to use when? Get quick pointers from CBT Nuggets instructor Simona Millham.
September 22, 2017
In this podcast, we explore the future of work with Robert Brown, AVP of the Cognizant Center for the Future of Work, who helps us answer the question, "What do we do when machines do everything?"
September 8, 2017
Greg Collins, a technology analyst and strategist with Exact Ventures, delivers a status report on 5G implementation plans and tells enterprises why they shouldn't wait to move ahead on potential use ....
August 25, 2017
Find out what business considerations are driving the SIP trunking market today, and learn a bit about how satisfied enterprises are with their providers. We talk with John Malone, president of The Ea....
August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.