SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Tom Nolle
Tom Nolle is the president and founder of CIMI Corporation and the principal consultant/analyst. Tom started his career as a...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Tom Nolle | October 28, 2015 |

 
   

Why Is the NFV Business Case so Hard?

Why Is the NFV Business Case so Hard? I'll give you three reasons -- two cynical and one fundamental.

I'll give you three reasons -- two cynical and one fundamental.

It's been almost exactly three years since a group of global network operators issued the call for action that launched network functions virtualization (NFV), and today it's almost impossible to read any network publication or website and not find mention of the technology. Given that, it seems surprising that more and more operators -- often the very members of that founding group -- are stepping up to say that making the business case for NFV is proving difficult. Why? I've looked at the matter carefully, and can point to three reasons -- two cynical ones and one that's fundamental.

Telling Tall Tales
First, vendors exaggerate mercilessly when they talk about what NFV can do, and the media eagerly accepts nonsense claims. Network operators have cited this specific issue as a problem with NFV justification, because every exaggeration is an invitation to a business case disappointment. The most common problem operators report is a claim of savings (usually 40% or more) without any specifics on the situations under which they might realize such savings.

Operators say they hate this sort of exaggeration because it leads to disappointments when they send an NFV project to the CFO for buy-in. Some CFOs already dismiss most NFV claims as clearly overstated, and others believe them and then wonder why their own companies are settling for less. Either way, it's difficult to overcome the bias that overstated benefit claims make, and impossible to stop vendors from making them.

Steven Spielberg once said that the best advice he ever received as a director was, "When you talk to the press, lie." That's sound advice if a good story is what everyone wants, and you can see how it combines with a natural tendency for vendors to exaggerate claims. A vendor that claims to deliver 40% savings with NFV trumps the one promising 20%, so benefit claims have edged upward.

Strategic Selling
The second barrier to a sound NFV business case is the high sales effort needed to drive the engagement. NFV sales people tell me that they often face a stark choice -- either try to promote some low-ball application of NFV that buyers see as a safe way to start but which won't stand up to CFO scrutiny, or swing for the seats and spend a year trying to build consensus for a broad strategy.

Part of the problem, according to the sales people, is the poor collateral available at the marketing and website level. What marketing doesn't do, sales organizations have to pick up, and those organizations have near-term quotas to make.

Small Thinking
The third and most significant problem with the NFV business case may be a surprise; NFV vendors are thinking too small. It's not that they are shy in claiming benefits, but that they're shy in setting the scope of their solutions. Of all the vendors claiming NFV solutions, less than half a dozen have even attempted to address all the elements needed for the business case. The reason, of course, is that it's a lot of work to do the right thing, and easier in many cases to just sing a pretty song to the media.

Small thinking is most evident in what NFV providers aren't providing. Many have no ability to support legacy infrastructure elements like switches and routers in their management and orchestration products. Most have no ability to orchestrate and integrate current operations support system (OSS), business support system (BSS), and network management system processes and tools -- this when operations savings would have to come from a complete integration of NFV with legacy equipment and with current management software and practices. Even "service agility" benefits demand wholesale operations automation.

A good example is virtual CPE, the replacement of a physical firewall, network address translation, and VPN appliance with a set of chained virtual functions. Some vendors argue that this substitution will save (you guessed it!) 40% because licensing the virtual functions is far cheaper than purchasing the appliance. But what about the hosting cost for each function, the cost of the virtual connections that chain them together, and the cost of operating this complex mesh of elements instead of a single contained device? Well, say vendors, that's OSS/BSS... and out of scope.

Perhaps a more fundamental issue is what one operator calls the "death by ten thousand benefits." Both vendors and the proof-of-concept approach to NFV promote the notion that NFV is not one big opportunity but hundreds or perhaps even thousands of small ones. CFOs trying to run the numbers on an NFV project cringe at the thought of trying to validate thousands of them. Not to mention that the basic notion of an efficient pool of resources and effective service creation and operations practices is hard to square with a driver consisting of a bunch of independent service applications. NFV, to work, has to be a new way of doing services overall and not a better way of doing each service separately.

So why is a NFV business case so hard? Because we don't really want one yet. It's more exciting to speculate about that 40% benefit than to try to deliver something less, even if that something would be enough. It's going to be a hard slog to change that, even with carriers facing revenue/cost-per-bit crossovers in 2017.

Follow Tom Nolle on Google+!
Tom Nolle on Google+





COMMENTS



Enterprise Connect Orlando 2018
March 12-15 | Orlando, FL

Connect with the Entire Enterprise Communications & Collaboration Ecosystem


Stay Up-to-Date: Hear industry visionaries in Keynotes and General Sessions delivering the latest insight on UC, mobility, collaboration and cloud

Grow Your Network: Connect with the largest gathering of enterprise IT and business leaders and influencers

Learn From Industry Leaders: Attend a full range of Conference Sessions, Free Programs and Special Events

Evaluate All Your Options: Engage with 190+ of the leading equipment, software and service providers

Have Fun! Mingle with sponsors, exhibitors, attendees, guest speakers and industry players during evening receptions

Register now with code NOJITTEREB to save $200 Off Advance Rates or get a FREE Expo Pass!

November 1, 2017

Your customers (internal and external) demand that you offer them the ability to connect by any means. With the adoption of cloud communications tools you now have access to an expanded portfolio o

October 18, 2017

Microsofts recent Ignite event had some critically important announcements for enterprise communications. Namely, Microsofts new Team Collaboration offering, Teams, will be its primary communicatio

September 20, 2017

Customer experience can make or break your business. But how do you achieve outstanding customer service when you're dealing with outdated organizational structure, lagging technology, dated proces

September 22, 2017
In this podcast, we explore the future of work with Robert Brown, AVP of the Cognizant Center for the Future of Work, who helps us answer the question, "What do we do when machines do everything?"
September 8, 2017
Greg Collins, a technology analyst and strategist with Exact Ventures, delivers a status report on 5G implementation plans and tells enterprises why they shouldn't wait to move ahead on potential use ....
August 25, 2017
Find out what business considerations are driving the SIP trunking market today, and learn a bit about how satisfied enterprises are with their providers. We talk with John Malone, president of The Ea....
August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.