SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Gary Audin
Gary Audin is the President of Delphi, Inc. He has more than 40 years of computer, communications and security...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Gary Audin | December 12, 2014 |

 
   

Go It Alone or Share Attack Data

Go It Alone or Share Attack Data To share or not to share, that is the question.

To share or not to share, that is the question.

When an organization is attacked, should that organization inform others of the attack, its success or failure, and how the organization responded to the attack? There are pros and cons.

The decision is both intellectual and probably emotional. Learning from others can bolster an organization's security. But sharing with others could also be used against the sharing organization to create better and more successful attacks. I have seen surveys of Session Border Controllers (SBC), where some respondents think that even simply revealing the vendor's name is a security issue.

NIST Document
"Time is not your friend when your information systems are under cyber-attack, but sharing threat information before, during, and after an attack with a trusted group of peers can help. Not only does it alert the other members of your community to a potential attack, it can provide critical actionable information to speed and bolster your own defenses. Participating in a formal information sharing group can greatly enhance an organization's cybersecurity capabilities."

This is a quote from a NIST press release "Cyber Security: Your Mother Was Right, Sharing is Good, And NIST Has Some Help on How."

Looking at a Sharing Site
Let's assume that sharing attack information is worthwhile. The first consideration is forming a sharing group. The open concerns are:

  • Creating a trusted sharing site
  • Protecting the sharing site from intrusion and attacks
  • Determining who should be members of the sharing site
  • Defining the qualifications of those accessing the site
  • Monitoring the use of the site and what attack data is shared
  • Preventing vendors from using the site to sell products or services
Since the site and its members are presumably working for each other's benefit, what information should be shared? The information sharing will probably have to be analyzed and approved by not only the CIO, CSO, and CFO but also the lawyers of the organization.

This is not meant to a social networking site. Be conscious that other members may not always be trustworthy. This is a site to create good relationships for the purpose of strengthening security. It is not a site to makes friends.

Who Should You Trust
Security is only as strong as the people that design, implement, and monitor the organization's security. Inside threats are still a common problem for IT security. So as a member, I would want to investigate my own employees before I submit them as site members. I would also like the other organizations to perform equally as good investigations of their employees. You may believe that there are no security problems with your staff, but you cannot say this about the other sharing site member's staff.

Many organizations use outside contractors for security. I would want and expect these contactors to accept the liabilities if their security functions are not followed properly or if the contractor's employees create a security problem whether deliberate or through ignorance or negligence. This is where the organization's CIO, CSO, and CFO need to be advised by their lawyers before signing any security contract. You may find that the liabilities accepted by the contractor are too one-sided to be worth pursuing. Do you want the contractors to be site members?

Someone authorized to share information may actually use the site to create vulnerabilities in the site's members. One approach is to severely limit those who can access and use the site. Another is to periodically review the site usage by the employee to look for unusual behavior. A third consideration is to review the employee's contributions to the site. Look for few or no contributions, determine if the contributions help others, if the employee goes beyond information sharing, and whether the employee contributes questionable attack information and doubtful attack mitigation solutions.

The highest level of trust should be with the person monitoring the security employees. This person should also be accountable for security lapses when sharing information. You may want to empower a security committee to periodically oversee the internal security operation to ensure there is no collusion among employees that can compromise security.

When I performed security checks for military intelligence, I was tasked with checking the security in other departments - not my own department. Those outside my department checked my security. It was never known when the security checks would occur, and the everyday operations would be checked without notice. This should be the same philosophy when checking on the security staff and reviewing the threat information sharing site.

Keeping Safe While Sharing
Sharing security attack and intrusion information can help others. Your organization wants to benefit and improve from the information that other organizations have. It is a two way street.

The organization has to develop and enforce policies and procedures about threat sharing. The downside of too many restrictions is that this will lessen the quantity, quality, and timeliness of the shared information. To loosen restrictions can essentially publish the organization's vulnerabilities. This is a difficult condition to balance. Too little shared information can be as harmful as too much information shared.

The NIST document strongly recommends that a full inventory of the organization's information must be established and kept rapidly and consistently updated. There should be informative annotations stored with the attack description. Needless to say, all of this requires strong and applicable security controls be produced and enforced.

The Benefits
The security problems will not disappear. Knowledge is a good thing. More knowledge means the better the security. Sharing can help the organization focus its security efforts on the most dangerous problems. The security staff has to be able to prioritize their efforts and become even more efficient. The security problems will not disappear. The security staff using the shared information can become more agile and respond to the attacks and intrusions faster, thereby reducing the success of security threats.





COMMENTS



Enterprise Connect Orlando 2018
March 12-15 | Orlando, FL

Connect with the Entire Enterprise Communications & Collaboration Ecosystem


Stay Up-to-Date: Hear industry visionaries in Keynotes and General Sessions delivering the latest insight on UC, mobility, collaboration and cloud

Grow Your Network: Connect with the largest gathering of enterprise IT and business leaders and influencers

Learn From Industry Leaders: Attend a full range of Conference Sessions, Free Programs and Special Events

Evaluate All Your Options: Engage with 190+ of the leading equipment, software and service providers

Have Fun! Mingle with sponsors, exhibitors, attendees, guest speakers and industry players during evening receptions

Register now with code NOJITTEREB to save $200 Off Advance Rates or get a FREE Expo Pass!

October 18, 2017

Microsofts recent Ignite event had some critically important announcements for enterprise communications. Namely, Microsofts new Team Collaboration offering, Teams, will be its primary communicatio

September 20, 2017

Customer experience can make or break your business. But how do you achieve outstanding customer service when you're dealing with outdated organizational structure, lagging technology, dated proces

August 16, 2017

Contact centers have long been at the leading edge of innovation in communications technology, given their promise of measurable ROI and the continual need to optimize customer interactions and sta

September 22, 2017
In this podcast, we explore the future of work with Robert Brown, AVP of the Cognizant Center for the Future of Work, who helps us answer the question, "What do we do when machines do everything?"
September 8, 2017
Greg Collins, a technology analyst and strategist with Exact Ventures, delivers a status report on 5G implementation plans and tells enterprises why they shouldn't wait to move ahead on potential use ....
August 25, 2017
Find out what business considerations are driving the SIP trunking market today, and learn a bit about how satisfied enterprises are with their providers. We talk with John Malone, president of The Ea....
August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.