SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Andrew Prokop
Andrew Prokop has been heavily involved in the world of communications since the early 1980s. He holds five United States...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Andrew Prokop | November 24, 2014 |

 
   

Will WebRTC Replace SIP?

Will WebRTC Replace SIP? The focus shouldn't be on WebRTC vs. SIP, but on how to best complement the power and importance of one with the other.

The focus shouldn't be on WebRTC vs. SIP, but on how to best complement the power and importance of one with the other.

Over the past weeks and months, I've had a number of people ask me if WebRTC is going to replace SIP. At first I didn't have a good answer -- I really didn't understand WebRTC well enough to do the comparison. But now I do, and I'm happy to share my thoughts.

Before I do weigh in on the SIP vs. WebRTC question, however, let's be sure we all have the same understanding of each. Allow me to provide a quick explanation.

WebRTC, formally known as Web Real-Time Communications, allows Web browsers and other HTTP-based applications to send and receive real-time media. For instance, WebRTC allows you to make audio or video calls from a Web page. With WebRTC, the media is sent directly and securely from your device to the recipient's device.

If you've been involved in telecommunications for a while, you might be saying, "I thought we could already do that." The answer is "Yes," but prior to WebRTC you would have needed to download an application or use a browser plug-in like Flash.

Several problems come with this pre-WebRTC approach. Downloading applications can create security issues. Also, an application that works on a Microsoft operating system may not work on an Apple or Android OS.

The same goes for plug-ins: Flash works great on both my Windows PC and iMac, but it's not supported on my iPhone or iPad. With WebRTC, the technology is native to the browser itself. There is nothing to download or install.

WebRTC is concerned with two major tasks. It needs to acquire audio and video components on your device -- for example, your PC's video camera, speakers, and microphone. It then sends that data to the far end. This requires WebRTC to know how to navigate through firewalls and understand network address translation (NAT) issues.

Finally, while WebRTC developers were initially concerned with voice and video, they are now designing the technology to support all forms of peer-to-peer data sharing.

Let's Talk Signaling
Read the previous paragraphs again and you will see that WebRTC is all about media -- signaling never comes up. But something needs to ring the far end. Something needs to answer a ringing call. Something needs to release that call when it ends.

WebRTC does not define a signaling protocol. That is not because the developers were lazy or simply forgot that you need to signal another device before you can send media to it. Signaling was left out of WebRTC for two good reasons:

    1. Different applications may require/prefer different protocols. The WebRTC working group did not want to lock it down to something that may turn out to be inadequate for all its uses.

    2. WebRTC runs in a Web browser, and support for signaling would require that Web pages be stateful. This becomes problematic if signaling is lost each time a page reloads.

Since signaling is required for call setup, WebRTC solutions must include a signaling server of some type. Again, WebRTC itself doesn't care how that server implements signaling, but it must exist somewhere in the network -- which brings us to SIP, or as it's formally known, the Session Initiation Protocol.

SIP defines signaling. In fact, that's all SIP defines. A separate protocol, the Session Description Protocol (SDP), defines media. SIP and SDP work together to create, manage, and tear down media sessions of any type.

Would you believe that WebRTC also uses SDP as part of its media setup? Like the developers of SIP, WebRTC developers saw something that worked and chose to reuse rather than reinvent.

Winner, Winner?
Let's go back to my original question: Does WebRTC replace SIP?

While the use cases for WebRTC and SIP overlap, one does not clearly replace the other. In some situations, WebRTC may even use SIP for its signaling agent. Of course, WebRTC enthusiasts might phrase that as "SIP uses WebRTC for its user interface." Regardless of your technological religious affiliation, if you look you'll find opportunities for synergy between the two.

For me, the ultimate answer to the question of one over the other comes down to this: Do you like apples more than oranges? While both are fruit, they are very different and each serves a role that the other cannot fill.

When I think about SIP, my mind visualizes enterprise SIP trunks, long carrier SIP trunks, SIP applications, SIP routing, and, yes, SIP multimedia endpoints. I can point to thousands of rock-solid implementations that use some or all aspects of SIP. However, I do not think of a Web browser as my user interface.

When I think about WebRTC, I think plug-in free, HTTP-based, multimedia endpoints. I don't think trunks, routing, or applications. That's not to diminish what WebRTC accomplishes. The applications built with WebRTC may one day force us to rethink what it means to make a telephone call. However, WebRTC won't replace the need for SIP or a SIP-like protocol. These two technologies are mostly different and somewhat the same, but both are very important.

Unlike certain political parties or nation states, SIP and WebRTC can peacefully coexist. Better yet, one can reinforce the power and importance of the other.

In other words, winner, winner, chicken dinner. We really can get along, after all.

Andrew Prokop writes about all things unified communications on his popular blog, SIP Adventures.

Follow Andrew Prokop on Twitter and LinkedIn!

@ajprokop

Andrew Prokop on LinkedIn





COMMENTS



April 19, 2017

Now more than ever, enterprise contact centers have a unique opportunity to lead the way towards complete, digital transformation. Moving your contact center to the cloud is a starting point, quick

April 5, 2017

Its no secret that the cloud offers significant benefits to enterprises - including cost reduction, scalability, higher efficiency, and more flexibility. If your phone system and contact center are

March 22, 2017

As today's competitive business environments push workforces into overdrive, many enterprises are seeking ways of streamlining workflows while optimizing productivity, business agility, and speed.

April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.