SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Melanie Turek
Melanie Turek is Vice President, Research at Frost & Sullivan. She is a renowned expert in unified communications, collaboration, social...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Melanie Turek | August 18, 2014 |

 
   

California Court Makes BYOD More Costly for Companies

California Court Makes BYOD More Costly for Companies The ruling essentially says this should be done on a case-by-case basis, which surely promises to be a massive headache for IT and the office of the CFO.

The ruling essentially says this should be done on a case-by-case basis, which surely promises to be a massive headache for IT and the office of the CFO.

Last week, a California court ruled that companies with employees in the state must reimburse those employees who use their personal cell phones to conduct work calls. It did not clearly specify how companies should do this, but it did acknowledge that the ruling stands even for employees with unlimited calling plans. It also did not rule on data usage or apps deployed and used for work purposes, but it seems a fair bet that those would be covered, too. Given that the case, Cochran v. Schwan's Home Service, has now gone to both the California Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal, the ruling will almost certainly stand.

What does this mean for the Bring Your Own Device trend that is so persistent in the modern workplace? Some have suggested it's the end of BYOD, but that seems unlikely; BYOD is so entrenched it would be almost impossible, I think, to turn back the clock. But the ruling will have consequences for California companies--and probably those based in other states, too.

The ruling is vague enough to make it hard to decipher how, exactly, companies will be required to calculate and reimburse usage. It essentially says this should be done on a case-by-case basis, which surely promises to be a massive headache for IT and the office of the CFO. For them, software that lets mobile phone users create two personas--one for work and one for "home"--may become a necessity. Alternatively, using tools that track usage and let employees manually code calls as "work" or "personal" could also be effective when it's time to calculate reimbursement costs.

At that point, the organization could, on a month-to-month basis, add a sum onto an employee's paycheck to cover the correct percentage of time/minutes spent on work-related calls in the previous 30 days. But even with the help of software tools, the system won't be simple. Will employees have to trigger a request for reimbursement themselves, as they would any other T&E report? Will users be willing to allow their employers to load tracking or dual-persona applications onto the mobile devices they technically own and pay for? Will accounting departments be ready to handle the volume of requests and reimbursements, especially within very large enterprises?

If nothing else, the ruling will force companies that have, until now, taken a wait-and-see approach to BYOD to implement a clear and enforceable policy around the use of personal phones for business. Some may decide that it is less costly--when one considers time and manpower as well as hard dollars--to just issue all employees company phones. Others may officially forbid the use of personal devices for business purposes, but it is unclear what would happen if a California employee ignored that rule and continued to use his or her personal phone for work calls.

And therein lies the rub. The case here was related to a company that required its employees to use personal phones for business. (In the ruling, the Court of Appeal wrote, "We hold that when employees must [emphasis mine] use their personal cellphones for work-related calls, Labor Code section 2802 requires the employer to reimburse them.")

But in many organizations, employees aren't required to conduct business on their phones; they simply choose to do so for reasons of convenience or personal preference. Indeed, that is really the true definition of BYOD: it's not that companies demand that employees purchase their own IT tools; it's that employees take it upon themselves to bring the tools they use at home into the office. Frost & Sullivan research shows that in many cases, they will even buy apps and devices with their own money to use at work because they find doing so makes them happier and/or more productive.

Cochran v. Schwan's Home Service doesn't speak to that broader BYOD trend, but it will likely impact it. At the very least, companies with business in California should now be on high alert: they have less than 30 days to figure out how to abide by the new requirement--or whether to put themselves in the position of having to follow it at all.

Follow Melanie Turek on Twitter and Google+!
@melanieturek
Melanie Turek on Google+





COMMENTS



August 16, 2017

Contact centers have long been at the leading edge of innovation in communications technology, given their promise of measurable ROI and the continual need to optimize customer interactions and sta

July 12, 2017

Enterprises have been migrating Unified Communications & Collaboration applications to datacenters - private clouds - for the past few years. With this move comes the opportunity to leverage da

May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.