SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Martha Buyer
Martha Buyer is an attorney whose practice is limited to the practice of telecommunications law. In this capacity, she has...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Martha Buyer | May 01, 2014 |

 
   

Wireless SLAs Are About Marketing, Not Service

Wireless SLAs Are About Marketing, Not Service While SLAs make sense in the landline and operational worlds, what purpose do they serve in the more unreliable wireless services world?

While SLAs make sense in the landline and operational worlds, what purpose do they serve in the more unreliable wireless services world?

Recently, a consultant for whom I have a great deal of respect asked me what I thought about wireless SLAs. I said it seemed like a strange concept to me, although I'm certainly familiar with SLAs in the landline and operational worlds. But the consultant who asked knows his stuff, so I decided that it was worth a deeper dive.

The problem is that wireless service is inherently unreliable. It works--and works well--most of the time. But the key word is "most." Further, when it fails, it fails miserably, as a result of power failures, atmospheric conditions or a host of other factors that are often beyond the control of the entity providing the SLA. As Frank Sinatra famously sang, "That's Life." And because wireless service can be so unreliable, wireless SLAs can wind up being so permissive as to be just about meaningless.

On the most basic level, an SLA is designed to provide a customer with some level of assurance that the service being ordered will work as promised by the eager salesperson. More specifically, customers have come to expect SLAs to define acceptable operational parameters. The expectation is that the network/system/device will function as promised 99.5% (or some other suitable percent) of the time. With any luck, as the end user, you'll never have to rely on the SLA or read its very small print to find out what steps are necessary to make good on it in the event of a network failure.

For their part, vendors and the lawyers drafting SLAs recognize that the true purpose of these documents is to provide some level of assurance to concerned consumers. Make no mistake, the SLA was created largely as a marketing tool--no matter what the technology. It's a kind of insurance policy that the product or service being ordered will work as intended (sort of.)

But even if a service provider offers an SLA primarily as a marketing strategy, it still promises a certain level of performance, which you have a legal right to expect. So, whatever great promises are made before the deal is signed, the critical question becomes: What factors can defeat/neutralize/invalidate promises made in an otherwise seemingly "friendly" SLA?

First and foremost, it's the small print. For these purposes, I would define the small print as including two essential components: the steps that need to be taken to invoke the SLA, and the list of those events/conditions/circumstances that the SLA doesn't cover.

Consider the following language that was taken from a major provider's wireless SLA:

XXX does not commit to a specific performance level for the radio network parts of the Service, and this part of the Service is not covered by any SLA. Radio network performance is provided on a "best [efforts]" basis.

The bottom line here is very simple: If the public wireless portion of the network (read: the transmission portion) fails, the vendor who has offered this SLA is off the hook. The vendor is correct to not promise what it cannot deliver--but given this very large exception, why even bother having an SLA?

In another section, the same vendor included the following paragraph:

Achieved throughput depends on the availability and load of the radio network used for any specific communication instance. Thus, XXX does not provide a committed level of throughout and throughput is not a part of XXX's SLA to the Customer. Throughput is provided according to best effort...

Bluntly speaking, if throughput isn't part of the SLA, what is? And if the standard is "best effort," how can that be quantified for the purpose of enforcing the SLA?

The second series of land mines often buried in an SLA involves the required steps to be taken by the customer to invoke the SLA, and the defined time period during which qualifying troubles can be reported to ensure that proper credit can be given when failures do occur.

In most, but not all cases, a call to the local account exec to notify him/her about the issue will not do the trick. It behooves any network manager to be familiar with the terms of the SLA to ensure that proper contact is made within the required time (generally a set amount of time from the outage) and to the right place as defined in the SLA to secure the credits that may be due.

Conclusion
Service and equipment providers exist in a highly competitive marketplace. Each one has its own strengths and vulnerabilities. If an SLA makes a customer feel more comfortable about its vendor choices, it is a good thing. An SLA is an insurance policy, but it's only useful if what fails is covered. The devil really is in the details.

Thus it's essential that should the existence of an SLA be the deciding factor in making a vendor choice, the SLA be read with a critical eye to the fine print. Check what's written not on page 1, but on page 7. With any luck, an enterprise will never need to invoke the SLA for any reason. But if the network's down, the enterprise user's knowledge of what's covered and what isn't is essential.





COMMENTS



August 16, 2017

Contact centers have long been at the leading edge of innovation in communications technology, given their promise of measurable ROI and the continual need to optimize customer interactions and sta

July 12, 2017

Enterprises have been migrating Unified Communications & Collaboration applications to datacenters - private clouds - for the past few years. With this move comes the opportunity to leverage da

May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.