SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Gary Audin
Gary Audin is the President of Delphi, Inc. He has more than 40 years of computer, communications and security...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Gary Audin | January 24, 2014 |

 
   

Collecting Internet Evidence, Part 1

Collecting Internet Evidence, Part 1 Investigative procedures are different in Internet-based crimes than they are with attacks on a single network.

Investigative procedures are different in Internet-based crimes than they are with attacks on a single network.

You have been attacked, information stolen, data modified. You may not even know these problems exist on your network, desktops, mobile devices, and data centers. You have dedicated resources to prevent these problems, but now that it has occurred, you need to collect information on the malicious behavior to prevent it from happening again, as well as to develop a case if you choose to pursue the perpetrators.

Todd Shipley and Art Bowker co-authored "Investigating Internet Crimes: An Introduction to Solving Crimes in Cyberspace," which was just released this December. I contacted Todd to interview him about collecting Internet evidence. This blog is part 1 of that interview.

I have heard of network forensics and Internet forensics. What is the difference?
Todd Shipley:
First, you have to define the terms "network forensics" and "Internet forensics". Network forensics can broadly be defined as the identification, collection, and documentation of actions committed against an individual network. This can be a very large network, but what we are collecting and documenting are actions taken against that individual network (by internal or external sources) by those in control of the network [who gain] access to the hardware and software running on the network.

The term "Internet forensics" is most often applied by digital forensic examiners as the identification of Internet-related artifacts on a computer that has been forensically imaged and [is] again under the investigator's control.

Investigating crimes on the Internet is cases [in which] the investigator is looking at data live on the Internet and stored on computers and servers not under the investigator's direct control. The interaction with this data is done through one of several standard protocols and tools as simple as your favorite browser. However, this data is often in motion on these servers, meaning that data is added, subtracted, and deleted constantly, as demonstrated through most social media sites. The data the investigator finds relevant to his investigation may be changed, or not there at all, when they go back a second time to look at the data. Collecting and documenting their findings in real time are essential parts of the Internet investigator's function.

Is there any standardization of the investigation process?
TS:
Investigating crimes on the Internet often depends on the crime. In law enforcement, the most thoroughly documented processes are among the Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Forces nationwide. The investigators assigned to crimes against children are highly trained and supervised. The organization applies procedures for investigating these crimes across its membership.

With that as the example, most other Internet crimes investigated do not rise to this level of standardization. The National Institute of Justice (NIJ), part of the U.S. DOJ, published a text on Investigating Crime on the Internet. It was an early attempt at providing a general guidance for law enforcement investigators looking into Internet crimes. Since then a variety of books have touched on the topic, but most have focused on the forensic examination of individual computers or networks and not the data in movement on the Internet.

What are the questions and procedures for investigating Internet forensics?
TS:
Understanding the environment they are going into is paramount. Build a plan for the investigation: Why are you investigating the case? Where are you looking on the Internet for victims, suspect, and witnesses? Does your agency or company have a policy regarding Internet investigations? What does the policy allow? Are you conducting an investigation from your office desktop or are you using a computer segregated from the agency/company network to prevent contamination of the entire network? What methods are they using to document their activities and any evidence they may find? What are the local, state and federal laws regarding these investigations and investigator's actions online? What is the current case law regarding its use and introduction into any litigation? How are you storing and maintaining case data from the investigation? Is the investigator going undercover on the Internet? If so, what is the agency/company policy governing the investigator during these operations? What training has the investigator had in conducting investigations on the Internet?

These are a few of the things that need to be answered long before the investigator goes on the Internet.

The items that stand out from the list above include:

1) [Establish] a policy governing the investigation of Internet crimes
2) Define a plan of the investigation before you go online
3) Use a computer that if compromised will not allow for further compromise of the agency or company network
4) Obtain training for the investigation of Internet-related crimes
5) Understand the changing legal landscape regarding the use of information found on the Internet.

Are there legal issues and limitations for performing Internet forensics?
TS:
There are legal issues regarding the investigation of Internet crimes. Traditional investigative limitations apply, such as an undercover investigator's limitations regarding entrapment.

There are also traditional methods of investigation that are governed by internal policy and procedures that most often apply to Internet investigations but are often overlooked from a management point of view. The case law is developing rapidly surrounding the collection, preservation, and presentation of data found on the Internet. In most cases the data should be handled no differently than other objectively collected digital evidence found on a computer or cell phone. Collect it, apply a Hash algorithm to the collected data, and document what you have done.

Now the collection can be in very different forms, as the data cannot always be directly accessed. A snapshot of the browser on the screen may be the only documentation made of the evidence. Courts have been accepting the authentication of the snapshot as the representation of what the person collecting the data saw. However, there still is a validation issue as to whether or not the data is true or can be tied to the person(s) to have allegedly posted the data. The investigator still needs to use traditional methods of investigation such as subpoenas or search warrants to an Internet Service Provider to verify if someone was assigned an Internet Protocol address associated with the data posted. The courts will continue to review Internet-based data and apply the existing framework of laws around the data investigators collect.

###

Todd G. Shipley has more than 25 years of experience in law enforcement: from investigating financial and computer crimes to overseeing the training of high-tech crimes investigators. Between 2004 and 2007, he was the Director of Systems Security and High Tech Crime Prevention Training--and manager of the National Criminal Justice Computer Laboratory and Training Center--for SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics.





COMMENTS



August 16, 2017

Contact centers have long been at the leading edge of innovation in communications technology, given their promise of measurable ROI and the continual need to optimize customer interactions and sta

July 12, 2017

Enterprises have been migrating Unified Communications & Collaboration applications to datacenters - private clouds - for the past few years. With this move comes the opportunity to leverage da

May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.