SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Robin Gareiss
Robin Gareiss is president and founder of Nemertes Research, where she oversees research product development, conducts primary research, and advises...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Robin Gareiss | March 13, 2013 |

 
   

Considering Lync for Telephony? Plan for Rising Opex

Considering Lync for Telephony? Plan for Rising Opex IT leaders believe going into a Lync telephony deployment that they will save money, which they may on the initial capital costs and licensing. The problem, though, is Lync is an expensive operational proposition.

IT leaders believe going into a Lync telephony deployment that they will save money, which they may on the initial capital costs and licensing. The problem, though, is Lync is an expensive operational proposition.

As companies embrace the unified-communications capabilities of Microsoft Lync, the bean counters are furiously examining the financial benefits of adding voice as an option.

After all, Microsoft makes it easy and financially appealing to add voice to Lync's already-popular instant messaging, presence, and video capabilities. What may not be apparent, though, is Lync's operational costs can be significantly higher than competitors'.

Nemertes recently conducted an independent study on the IP telephony and UC implementations of 211 companies, gathering data on the following vendors: Alcatel-Lucent, Avaya, Cisco, Microsoft, NEC, ShoreTel, and Siemens. When it comes to telephony, Microsoft is the newcomer in that list and is garnering significant interest among telecom leaders.

Lync, and its predecessor Office Communications Server (OCS), provide a tightly integrated desktop communications system for IM, presence, video, and Web conferencing. Adding voice is a natural extension, a fact not lost on Microsoft licensing experts. In our research, the capital costs, including licensing, servers, and other related endpoint hardware, for Microsoft customers are only $480 per end unit, vs. $540 median. (See Figure below.)

IT leaders believe going into a Lync telephony deployment that they will save money, which they may on the initial capital costs and licensing. The problem, though, is Lync is an expensive operational proposition, particularly for those integrating it with other telephony products. The median annual operational costs across the vendors we studied, including internal staff, third party partners, annual maintenance, and training, are $704 per end unit. Microsoft customers in our benchmark, however, spend $1,912.

In all areas of operational costs we benchmarked, Microsoft's are higher than the median. For example, IT professionals in our research who use Microsoft spend more than three times the median on internal staff per endpoint, attributing the figure to muti-vendor integration challenges and sound quality issues.

Considering that many companies do not have internal Microsoft telephony experts, they often turn to third-party experts. Microsoft customers spend more on third-party partners than any other vendor's customers--with $86.32 per end unit, compared with $25 per end unit for Avaya. This makes sense, given the staffs at Avaya shops tend to be experienced telecom experts, typically with years operating Avaya systems. In Microsoft environments, on the other hand, telephony is a new application and internal staff expertise still is lacking, which also explains why they spend the most for training.

During our interviews in this project and in previous years of conducting TCO research, we have found that operational costs tend to be highest during the first two years of usage of a new technology, as staffs gain expertise. For example, companies using Cisco in its early days of IP telephony saw higher operational costs, as well. After about two years of using the technology, the operational costs drop by about 20%.

Bottom line for now: Though Microsoft telephony costs for capital are attractive, ongoing operational costs are not, particularly for those trying to integrate it with existing IP telephony systems.

Building an accurate business case, including capital, implementation, and operational costs, is crucial to selecting the best vendor and architecture for your organization. It's tough to get accurate operational costs before actually incurring those costs, which is one reason we conducted this research.

Join me next week as I review further details on IP telephony and UC costs at the Enterprise Connect session: Building the UC Business Case Monday, March 18, at 2 pm. For more information on the session, visit: http://www.enterpriseconnect.com/orlando/conference/overview.php?session_id=9





COMMENTS



Enterprise Connect Orlando 2017
March 27-30 | Orlando, FL
Connect with the Entire Enterprise Communications & Collaboration Ecosystem


Stay Up-to-Date: Hear industry visionaries in Keynotes and General Sessions delivering the latest insight on UC, mobility, collaboration and cloud

Grow Your Network: Connect with the largest gathering of enterprise IT and business leaders and influencers

Learn From Industry Leaders: Attend a full range of Conference Sessions, Free Programs and Special Events

Evaluate All Your Options: Engage with 190+ of the leading equipment, software and service providers

Have Fun! Mingle with sponsors, exhibitors, attendees, guest speakers and industry players during evening receptions

Special Offer - Save $200 Off Advance Rates

Register now with code NOJITTEREB to save $200 Off Advance Rates or get a FREE Expo Pass!

April 5, 2017

Its no secret that the cloud offers significant benefits to enterprises - including cost reduction, scalability, higher efficiency, and more flexibility. If your phone system and contact center are

March 22, 2017

As today's competitive business environments push workforces into overdrive, many enterprises are seeking ways of streamlining workflows while optimizing productivity, business agility, and speed.

March 8, 2017

Enterprise IT's ability to innovate is critical to the success of the business -- 80% of CIOs agree. But the CIO role has never been more challenging than it is today, with rising operational respo

March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.