ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Gary Audin
Gary Audin is the President of Delphi, Inc. He has more than 40 years of computer, communications and security...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Gary Audin | February 15, 2013 |

 
   

Free Social Network Speech

Free Social Network Speech Social media policies cannot just restrict employees' right of free speech. The policies must be fair and enforceable in court.

Social media policies cannot just restrict employees' right of free speech. The policies must be fair and enforceable in court.

Get that social networking policy right. Too broad or too vague and you may be facing the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

In these days of increased social media messages, people often express their views and complaints in both private and public (online) venues. As a result, increasingly, employers have been attempting to limit what employees publically post online. Making your boss angry may provoke an effort to punish you, but the employer is constrained by labor law. As an employee, you do run the risk that you can still be penalized for some other work related infraction which can be used even if the social media posting is the real reason for punishment.

However, when it comes to the clash of employees' right to free expression on social media and employers' desire not to have employees disparage the company, it's important to understand where the law and regulations come down. In general, whoever is writing social media policies must keep in mind that the employer cannot just restrict their employees' right of free speech. The policies must be fair and enforceable in court.

Employers naturally want to discourage comments that are negative about them. These policies are in some cases draconian, such as you will be fired if you disparage managers, the company, or co-workers. However, a series of rulings by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) have determined that such blanket restrictions are not legal. Employees have the right to discuss working conditions freely without the threat of punishment, whether the comments are at the office, at home or with friends or on Facebook.

This is not making some employers happy. They think the NLRB has gone too far, stating that the original intent of the NLRB's rules dealt with unionized worker speech in the industrial age, not every worker today. In response, the NLRB says it is applying traditional rules to new technology.

As an example, the NLRB recently issued a report (see "Acting General Counsel issues second social media report") that provides guidance to practitioners and human resource professionals.

This report's "Operations Management Memo" covers 14 cases. Seven of these cases examine corporate social media policies, of which five of were found to be unlawfully broad, one was lawful, and one was found to be lawful after it was revised.

The other half of the cases involved employee discharges after they posted comments to Facebook. Several discharges were found to be unlawful because they were based on unlawful policies. In one case, the discharge was upheld despite an unlawful policy because the employee's posting was not work-related. The report, which does not name the parties to the cases or their locations, illustrates that these cases are fact-specific, not generalized.

The report emphasizes two main points:

"Employer policies should not be so sweeping that they prohibit the kinds of activity protected by federal labor law, such as the discussion of wages or working conditions among employees. An employee's comments on social media are generally not protected if they are mere gripes not made in relation to group activity among employees."

These cases will be growing, not shrinking in the near future. The Acting General Counsel has requested all regional offices to send cases which the Regions believe to be meritorious to the agency's Division of Advice in Washington D.C., in the interest of tracking them and devising a consistent approach.

Anyone tasked with the job of writing acceptable polices should read the report. Each of the 14 cases makes a point that should be considered and avoided when writing the policies. The best policies protect the employee first and then the organization. Protecting the organization first usually leads to illegal policies that will cost the employer legal fees, harm the employer's reputation, reduce employee morale and the employer's ability to attract desirable workers.



COMMENTS


Who's Who at Enterprise Connect

NEC

Featured This Week:
Sponsored By


May 7, 2014
With the imperative to drive innovation and continuously improve business processes, the role of unified communications and collaboration (UCC) is rising in importance for most organization. Executive...
April 24, 2014
Small centers are both excited and nervous about the new wave of innovation converging on them as major disruptive forces - cloud, mobile, big data and social - rock the contact center world. They rea...
April 9, 2014
Recent advances in cloud technology have given rise to wide variety of new tools designed to support contact center performance, staffing and reporting. Join us for a live webinar focused on helping c...

Sign up to the No Jitter email newsletters

  • Catch up with the blogs, features and columns from No Jitter, the online community for the IP communications industry. Each Thursday, we'll send you a synopsis of the high-impact articles, podcasts and other material posted to No Jitter that week, with links for quick access.

  • A quick hit of original analysis by the experts who bring you Enterprise Connect, the leading event in Enterprise Communications & Collaboration. Each Wednesday, this enewsletter delivers to your email box a thought-provoking, objective take on the latest news and trends in the industry.

Your email address is required for membership. For details about the user information, please read the UBM Privacy Statement

As an added benefit, would you like to receive relevant 3rd party offers about new products/services and discounted offers via email? Yes

* = Required Field

No longer instrested? Unsubscribe here.