SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Dave Michels
Dave Michels is a Principal Analyst at TalkingPointz. His unique perspective on unified communications comes from a career involving telecommunications...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Dave Michels | November 26, 2012 |

 
   

Apple is Killing Us Softly

Apple is Killing Us Softly While we marvel at the design and innovation of their products, we need to understand the cost. Apple earned this. But at what point does it become too much?

While we marvel at the design and innovation of their products, we need to understand the cost. Apple earned this. But at what point does it become too much?

Apple is a phenomenal company and Steve Jobs was a brilliant visionary. The company is an icon to the American dream--from Dad's garage to world's most valuable company in about 35 years. It is nice to see the company rewarded for innovative products that captured the hearts and desires of so many people.

But Apple's incredible rise is not a reflection of the economy in general. Economic conditions, and how to fix them, were indeed among the top and most controversial aspects of the recent election. Apple is not the rising tide that lifted all boats, but rather the opposite. It is a zero sum economy, and Apple's growth is at a far greater price than is reasonable.

Take a look at the nearby shopping center: Most likely the busiest store is the Apple store, on average consuming more dollars per square foot than any other retailer--a feat that is becoming easier with all the nearby "For Lease" signs. Gone are the computer stores, software stores, music stores, and movie rental stores. The nightmare of owning a Blockbuster in the age of the iPad was the theme of a "South Park" Halloween special.

The problem is bigger than retail.

Consider consumer electronics as a whole. Once-dominant Sony, Panasonic, and Sharp are all in crisis. Sony's Walkman products owned the market for portable music pre-iPod. Computers? Dell, HP, and Lenovo are scrambling to react to Apple's Air and iPad. Distribution? Think Borders, Capitol Records, Egghead, and Blockbuster. Cameras? Nikon and Canon are both down about 50% in profits--despite the bankruptcy of Kodak and an Enron-like fiasco that beset competitor Olympus. Cell phones? Blackberry has been hemorrhaging customers since the iPhone's introduction, and the then-market leader Nokia is on the edge of irrelevance. Games? Sony and Nintendo have both reported declines in forecasts and revenue. The list goes on.

Sony recently posted a record loss of $5.55 billion. It is being hit hard across multiple business units including computers, cameras, music players, gaming, movies and music--all of which compete with Apple.

With music players and mobile phones, Apple taught Microsoft some hard lessons about consumerization. Microsoft is attempting to respond to the iPad with an ambitious strategy around Windows 8. Microsoft, like Google, has been pushed into manufacturing its own tablet at the expense of longtime hardware partnerships. There is no denying that Microsoft's influence has diminished with Apple's rise.

There are always winners and losers, but we are talking entire industries here--VoIP and unified communications included. Cisco and Avaya both reported declines in UC revenues, and along with most of the industry, now prominently feature iPad apps in their portfolios. Remember when a vendor's products had the same vendor's name on them? FaceTime visually connects the C-suite, which has impacted Cisco and Polycom. There are an astonishing number of iPads on display in conference booths at events that don't even list Apple as a sponsor or exhibitor--including Enterprise Connect and CES.

Vendors have little choice but to try to ride Apple's coattails. That's because Apple doesn't easily share. When Microsoft rose in the '90s it also brought along Intel, Compaq, HP, Dell, Adobe, Symantec, and many more. Many vendors are happy to just be ignored by Apple--ask Adobe.

Typically, when a manufacturer rises, the channel wins. But with Apple, its direct retail dominates. Many of Apple's retail partners are gone, including CompUSA, Circuit City and countless local Apple dealers. There's a strong ecosystem of third-party accessories, but many pay Apple licensing fees. Software distributors should be growing with the success of new platforms, but the App Store has a lock on the market and takes a hefty 30% distribution fee (previously, software distribution was a low-margin business).

There are a few winners with Apple's success. China got most of the manufacturing jobs. US victors include Corning, numerous software developers, FedEx, and UPS. And of course an army of lawyers that have litigated suppliers, competitors, and partners.

That sucking sound from Cupertino isn't just related to competitors. It's also about practices. An example is BYOD, the result of corporate phones not being as desirable as iPhones. Aberdeen estimates that 1,000 smartphones adopted via BYOD can cost an organization an additional $170,000 per year--largely due to 1,000 monthly reimbursement checks instead of a single check for a discounted contract. That's cash that could have gone to other corporate purchases. Consumerization has a nice sound to it, but Apple is making modest or no attempts to accommodate the needs of large organizations.

I get capitalism. Apple earned this. But at what point does it become too much? Typically, we rely on antitrust rules to protect us from big companies. Antitrust laws were drafted in response to abuses from Standard Oil which, at one time, was the most valuable company in the world. Apple currently holds that title, but antitrust rules don't seem to apply as Apple is not the dominant (monopolistic) vendor in most of its markets. Its anti-competitive effects are not from its market share, but rather from its wallet share. There's only so much oxygen in the economy, and entire industries are suffocating.

In October and September, Pandora, a music streaming service, had its stock halted from trading. Not because of what the company did or said, but because of a rumor that Apple was going to expand into music streaming. Pandora's stock dropped 11% on that rumor. Pandora has multiple viable competitors, but the Internet is big enough for all of them to flourish--unless one of the competitors is Apple.

Apple makes wonderful products. I don't mean to tread on their innovation or success. My goal is to question when too much of a good thing becomes poisonous. While we marvel at the design and innovation of their products, we need to understand the cost. When it comes to our economy, do we want to continue to let the i's have it? All around us companies are struggling. The general news is poor quarterly announcements and layoffs. Where has all the money gone?

Dave Michels is a contributing Editor and analyst at TalkingPointz.





COMMENTS



April 5, 2017

Its no secret that the cloud offers significant benefits to enterprises - including cost reduction, scalability, higher efficiency, and more flexibility. If your phone system and contact center are

March 22, 2017

As today's competitive business environments push workforces into overdrive, many enterprises are seeking ways of streamlining workflows while optimizing productivity, business agility, and speed.

March 8, 2017

Enterprise IT's ability to innovate is critical to the success of the business -- 80% of CIOs agree. But the CIO role has never been more challenging than it is today, with rising operational respo

March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.