SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Neal Shact
Neal Shact is the founder and CEO of CommunITech Services, a Systems Integrator focused on improving the customer experience in...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Neal Shact | October 21, 2012 |

 
   

Where is CEBP Hiding?

Where is CEBP Hiding? Here are some questions you should ask to help you determine whether a vendor makes a good partner for Communications-Enabled Business Processes (CEBP).

Here are some questions you should ask to help you determine whether a vendor makes a good partner for Communications-Enabled Business Processes (CEBP).

Blair Pleasant, co-founder of UCStratgies.com, recently posed this question on No Jitter while reporting from Dreamforce. The answer is as simple as it is revealing. Salesforce is focused on their own product--Customer Relationship Management (CRM)--and little else. Their path is on adding features to their CRM offering. They don't offer any other business applications software or communications capabilities. In short, Salesforce is a business silo and they are focused on their one application and adding features to it. Capabilities can be added as long as you are prepared to undertake complicated and costly integrations subject to the API's parameters and relevant security testing, not to mention multiple suppliers' product release schedules.

Similarly, traditional telecommunications vendors are focused on delivering their own Unified Communications (UC) capabilities. The components within their UC bundles are bundles of interrelated communications modalities, or in other words, UC silos. Their communications capabilities work well with each other and maybe even with productivity tool packages, but little else.

Specialized applications companies like Salesforce and telecommunications (UC) vendors purport to offer Communications Enabled Business Processes (CEBP). Neither Salesforce nor the UC vendors designed their products from the ground up with the intent to offer CEBP. Integrating their offerings all requires expensive middleware, asynchronous APIs (applications from multiple vendors don't seem to be available simultaneously) and a lot of heavy lifting from expensive VARs and consultants.

Business process software is complex. This almost mandates that the only companies that can communications-enable business processes are those companies that make business process software in the first place, like SAP and Oracle.

Creating and maintaining CEBP can be and usually is a complex undertaking to both implement and support. Companies like SAP offer native integrations between their business applications and their communications capabilities. If you are working with disparate vendors, make sure that you understand how and what applications will be working together. Implementing technology exposes risks including unexpected downtime, business interruptions, incompatibilities, limited features, clumsy functionality and higher Total Cost of Ownership. Of course, all of these directly impact customer satisfaction and organizational success.

If you're looking into CEBP, and someone says they integrate to your system, what features and functionality does that integration provide? Beyond the obvious questions of cost and time frame, make sure to ask the following questions:

1. Do the technology vendors on both sides have a formal business arrangement? What is their commitment to each other on testing new releases? Is it a mutual agreement or is one company subordinate to the other?

2. What type of API interface is it (code or web services)?

3. Are the interfaces tested and certified? By whom?

4. Who answers support questions?

5. How long has the API been in existence? If the API is new, its deficiencies may not have been uncovered yet. The longer it has been around, the more likely the issues of poor documentation or design have been addressed. In those cases, older is better. On the other hand, there are some companies that are moving away from their traditional APIs to web services. How long the older-style APIs will be supported is anyone's guess.

6. Is the documentation available? Do users feel it is adequate or too tightly constrained?

7. What capabilities are allowed by the integration?

8. What skills does it take to write to the API (e.g., XML, SOAP, Python, C) when an update is required?

9. If you are connecting your CRM or ERP system to your contact center platform, is a custom connector required to integrate the systems together?

10. In the process of selecting your contact center and CRM platform, have you researched vendors' hardware and software roadmaps to ensure future compatibility (to avoid possibly forgoing or delaying future upgrades due to incompatibilities)?

11. Do your contact center solution and provider follow best practices and industry standards?

12. Do the suppliers of your technology have a stable, growing and profitable business to ensure their long term commitment to research and development for the solutions that you are investing in?





COMMENTS



August 16, 2017

Contact centers have long been at the leading edge of innovation in communications technology, given their promise of measurable ROI and the continual need to optimize customer interactions and sta

July 12, 2017

Enterprises have been migrating Unified Communications & Collaboration applications to datacenters - private clouds - for the past few years. With this move comes the opportunity to leverage da

May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.