SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Tsahi Levent -Levi
Tsahi Levent-Levi is an independent analyst and consultant for WebRTC.Tsahi has over 15 years of experience in the telecommunications, VoIP,and...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Tsahi Levent -Levi | September 19, 2012 |

 
   

On Openness, FaceTime and WebRTC

On Openness, FaceTime and WebRTC WebRTC kills the physical barriers the over-the-top players like FaceTime rely on today--paving the way for newer, leaner startups to join the VoIP game.

WebRTC kills the physical barriers the over-the-top players like FaceTime rely on today--paving the way for newer, leaner startups to join the VoIP game.

If it isn't clear that FaceTime is a failure in Apple's standards, then it should be.

It wasn't that long ago (2 years now) that Steve Jobs introduced FaceTime, a video chat service based on "open standards." Fast forward to today, FaceTime may be using SIP, RTP, H.264 and AAC-LD--but it isn't open. Or standardized itself.

A bit over a year ago Zach Holman complained about FaceTime on his blog:

"There's certainly a possibility that FaceTime may still be ratified as an open standard. Maybe Steve just misspoke when he gave concrete dates and steps to open up the FaceTime protocol. Maybe it happens the day after I publish this blog post. But regardless of the reason, we are stuck here more than a year later, with FaceTime siloed strictly to Apple devices and (to my knowledge) zero standards bodies reviewing a proposed FaceTime protocol spec."

Well, we're now two years later with FaceTime siloed strictly to Apple devices--which only goes to show that OTT VoIP solutions are based on lock in: get as many users as possible into the service, but make sure they never get out. Unless it is to a PSTN phone, where we can charge for it.

WebRTC is probably the lost opportunity for FaceTime (not for Apple mind you). WebRTC is open in a way that was never before seen--not only do we have a spec for it, but we have an open source implementation, open codecs (for now), and it all comes from the browser.

Next time you get pitched about an standards based, open service from an OTT vendor that claims to be using SIP or XMPP, check out how he monetizes his solution. I guarantee that in 99% of the cases, it will be based on you making all your calls within his walled garden.

And this is why WebRTC is such a huge threat and a disruptor to OTT vendors: it obsoletes the need of a sign up process and an application download to work between people. It kills the physical barriers OTT players rely on today, paving the way for newer, leaner startups to join the VoIP game.




COMMENTS



August 10, 2016
Enterprises are increasingly considering Unified Communications as a Service (UCaaS) as the basis for their communications infrastructure strategy going forward. But some have been reluctant to commit...
July 27, 2016
Unlock the full potential of Microsoft Skype for Business using skills that would make MacGyver proud. Organizations moving to Skype for Business often need assistance in onboarding, training, advance...
July 13, 2016
The obvious benefits of unified communications -- user connectivity and collaboration from any location along with significant cost savings -- are impossible to ignore. However, if youre in the proces...