SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Dave Michels
Dave Michels is a Principal Analyst at TalkingPointz. His unique perspective on unified communications comes from a career involving telecommunications...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Dave Michels | July 24, 2012 |

 
   

IVR: Interactive Voice Respect

IVR: Interactive Voice Respect Increasing customer sophistication means that your self-service mechanisms will have to become increasingly sophisticated as well.

Increasing customer sophistication means that your self-service mechanisms will have to become increasingly sophisticated as well.

Perhaps the worst example of technology gone awry is Interactive Voice Response (IVR) systems. The technology started picking up traction in the 80s, and offered a variety of customer self-service capabilities. The IVR promised the business cost savings, and the customer 24-hour intuitive phone-based assistance. Prior to the IVR, something as simple as a bank balance was only available over the phone from a live agent that worked banking hours. The IVR was the perfect solution--what could possibly go wrong?

Too much of a good thing! We know what went wrong: over-automation, impossible-to-reach human agents, and phone trees from hell. The IVR isn't associated with general helpfulness, but instead is seen as a barrier to the assistance we seek. The IVR delivered on the cost savings portion of the equation, but wasn't quite the boon to customer satisfaction we expected. Good technology gone bad.

Frustrated by this, I approached a colleague who works in this area to ask him what went wrong. Don Van Doren, a partner at Unicomm Consulting, often works with enterprises to fix their IVRs. Don said:

"There are numerous situations in which many people prefer to work with an effective self-service solution such as an IVR. A common mistake is using internal jargon, or organizing menus based on internal organization structure, rather than how the customer thinks about things. We are often successful in getting organizations to think about this from the customer perspective. Sometimes, to get their attention, we'll record IVR sessions and play them back to horrified senior managers."

Don's comment confirms my suspicion that no one intends to create a terrible IVR, but whatever precautions are being taken are clearly not sufficient. The Wall Street Journal recently discussed this in Press 9 for more Options:

"I've been doing some research on this issue, and I've discovered that customer backlash against automated phone answering services is surging. Websites are proliferating with tips and tricks about how to navigate through these systems, head-fake the robotic gatekeepers, and minimize waiting times.

The first obvious pointer is to say 'agent,' 'operator,' or 'complaint,' over and over, no matter what the question. Another pointer is to never be cooperative or play by their rules; they want you to be as docile as a lamb."

In that article, Moore blurs the frustrations of IVRs and call centers, which he feels are conspiring to ensure maximum frustration. Call centers nearly always put their agents behind IVRs that attempt to resolve and sort calls, but regularly fail at both. IVRs are also used independently of call centers.

The NY Times reports the problem is worse than just the IVR, and that technical companies in particular avoid voice interactions altogether. In Tech Companies Leave Phone Calls Behind. The article points out that. Facebook, Twitter, Google, Quora, and LinkedIn have either hidden or unpublished numbers. It compares LinkedIn's system to the movie Groundhog Day.

Not everyone is blaming the technology. Doc Searls of WSJ thinks it is the attitudes that businesses have toward customers. In The Customer As a God, he writes:

"Big business continues to believe that a free market is one in which customers get to choose their captors. Choosing among AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon for your new smartphone is like choosing where you'd like to live under house arrest. It's why marketers still talk about customers as "targets" they can 'acquire,' 'control,' 'manage' and 'lock in,' as if they were cattle."

All these articles together suggest that tolerance of robotic rudeness is wearing thin. I am happy to report that after a decade of unchecked abuse there are several vendors working to correct the madness.

Fonolo provides a bridge between the user's IVR and website. Fonolo believes customers often try to resolve their issues via the website first. If a call is still needed, they must then start over at the top of the tree. Fonolo's technology attempts to retain what's been learned and transfers the caller directly to the appropriate IVR branch or queue while retaining captured information. A separate product offers virtual hold and calls back the customers when an agent is available. It's a small company, but managed to pick up the coveted Best of Show Award at Enterprise Connect 2012.

Voxeo offers cloud-based IVR solutions, and is currently running a campaign based on the idea of "Zombie-IVR". According to Voxeo, a zombie-IVR is an out-of-date system that greets customers with unhelpful, one-size-fits-all menu, insisting the options "have recently changed" when they actually haven't for years, and requires customers to enter account codes--only to be asked for them again when they give up and transfer to an agent for help. Zombie IVRs drone on like the "talking dead" to infect the caller.

AVST: The IVR's roots are in voice mail, and as one of the largest standalone messaging vendors, AVST has evolved its CX-E platform to include rich UC and CEBP capabilities. CX-E combines messaging, fax, and IVR services with APIs, database interactions, outbound notifications, and a strong inter-operability among voice systems. That platform has a far broader tool set to ensure capable customer interaction. The company recently profiled a health care provider that integrated CX-E into its business processes involving in-home patient services. The health care provider dials in from each patient's home, which both logs activities and creates varioius metrics for reports.

Gold Systems, an IVR partner for Microsoft Lync, allows a customer to interact with agents via speech and IM while the agent is on another call. One application here is that a return caller could get routed to the original agent based on caller ID, but if the agent is busy they can still interact via IM. Because their product, Vonetix 7 Voice, was built to work with Lync, enterprises can build applications that are "UC enabled" and that do not require third-party speech recognition licenses.

The bottom line is the IVR is a major customer touch-point and should provide an excellent experience. Too often the IVR is seen solely as a cost savings measure. For the most part, it didn't matter because competitors did the same. But the tide is changing, and providing a strong customer experience just might be the in differentiator. There's nothing inherently wrong with saving money, but no business survives that doesn't continuously attract new and retain existing customers.

Dave Michels is a Contributing Editor and analyst at TalkingPointz.com





COMMENTS



July 12, 2017

Enterprises have been migrating Unified Communications & Collaboration applications to datacenters - private clouds - for the past few years. With this move comes the opportunity to leverage da

May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

April 19, 2017

Now more than ever, enterprise contact centers have a unique opportunity to lead the way towards complete, digital transformation. Moving your contact center to the cloud is a starting point, quick

July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.