SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Dave Michels
Dave Michels is a Principal Analyst at TalkingPointz. His unique perspective on unified communications comes from a career involving telecommunications...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Dave Michels | October 26, 2011 |

 
   

Amazon to Apple: Check

Amazon to Apple: Check Amazon is likely the only near-term viable alternative to the iPad.

Amazon is likely the only near-term viable alternative to the iPad.

Just a few years ago there were no tablet computers, at least not as we currently define them. It was just April 2010 when Apple sold its first iPad. Then came the avalanche. In 2010, a total of 14.8 million tablets were sold, and Apple dominates the current tablet market. All of the tablet competitors combined--RIM, HP, plus various Android model--only represent less than 20% of tablet sales.

However, Amazon is about to change all that. Amazon is likely the only near-term viable alternative to the iPad. The key word there was "alternative;" the Kindle Fire is not a direct competitor to the iPad, but represents a fascinating new sub-category. And although alternatives don’t necessarily make great drama, the story unfolding here is intriguing. Amazon trumped Google.

The iPad is a very simple device, so simple that there is no reasonable explanation why it took so long to discover it. The iPad is conceptually identical to the iPod Touch--which Apple unveiled in 2008. Clearly, iPods and iPhones were prerequisites in making the iPad possible. The iPad does not represent a technical break, though as is typically associated with revolutionary devices. The iPad is more about realizing the intersection between the technically possible and how mobility changes the nature of work. These factors created an opportunity for a new device category, and the iPad nails it.

Other devices with similar (even better) specifications fail. The iPad benefits from a strong ecosystem--a primordial stew that doesn’t exist for the other devices. This will continue for years to come.

Competitors trying to grab market share can’t just offer a device "as good as" the iPad, but instead need to shoot for "better." There are only so many hardware variables: screen size, processor, memory, I/O ports--they have all been tweaked. Better specifications bring a higher price, and higher specs (or even comparable specs) can’t come close to Apple’s volume-adjusted manufacturing costs. Competitors have no incentive to sell the tablet at or below cost (dumping--which HP took literally with the discontinued $99 TouchPad) because there is no assurance of subsequent revenue. Apple wins on parts, and on follow-through revenue because it makes money when customers buy apps at the App Store (while simultaneously building lock-in loyalty).

Toshiba, HTC, Samsung, and the others don't profit from Google Marketplace sales, nor do those purchases build customer loyalty. So instead they must profit on the sale of the device itself--which is practically impossible. Nor can they compete on value because no one can match the selection of Apple's App Store. HP realized its WebOS tablet could not compete on price or value, so they killed it.

But Android thrives because it does have a compelling proposition to manufacturers. It is free (well sort of). Android itself has been free and open sourced, but Google keeps a tight rein via its apps. For a vendor to include Gmail, the Android Market Place, Maps, and others apps, the device must be approved by Google, which somewhat cancels the flexibility and benefits of open source. Avaya’s and Cisco's Android tablets don't adhere to these Google requirements. Their markets are business users, so the Android Market Place is not as critical. Consumer-oriented devices generally do meet these requirements, and their customers expect these apps.

Amazon took a page from the Barnes & Noble Nook, and is using Android in its new Kindle Fire, but unlike the Nook, it is positioned as a general consumer tablet, albeit a lightweight version. Amazon has its own marketplace and its own digital media stash of content. Amazon designed the Fire primarily for its users to consume content, keeping the hardware requirements lower and inexpensive. Unfortunately, cheaper/simpler hardware has potential problems with the increasing complexity of the broad open Internet. Amazon solved this with a split browser, a VDI solution leveraging its cloud based data centers for the hard part of browsing. Amazon effectively built its own primordial stew, and its Fire will flourish.

HP demonstrated the price elasticity of tablets: low prices do equate to increased demand. At $199, the Kindle Fire is expected to fly off its virtual shelves. There is nothing else like it on the market. It's an amazing consumer proposition--low cost, versatile device, an app store, and an extensive collection of digital media. It's an impressive proposition for Amazon too, since Google did the heavy lifting with Android development--for free.

Google doesn't seem too sure about this. The last two releases of Android (Honeycomb and Ice Cream Sandwich) were not released as open source (yet). Google also has a problem with Microsoft successfully squeezing its Android partners on licensing (Microsoft stands to make more on Android than on Windows Phone). And now that Amazon is using Android to take on Apple without any benefit to Google (or acknowledgement), the whole notion of open source Android needs to be reevaluated. If Google takes no action, there is a risk that future Android smartphones will start including the Amazon Android market in lieu of Google's Market Place.

When you have Apple, Amazon, Google, and even Microsoft involved in the same battle, it gets interesting. Each of these companies has a very different vision and goals around tablets and mobility, putting their product strategies on a collision course.

Dave Michels is a frequent contributor and blogs about telecom at PinDropSoup.





COMMENTS



August 16, 2017

Contact centers have long been at the leading edge of innovation in communications technology, given their promise of measurable ROI and the continual need to optimize customer interactions and sta

July 12, 2017

Enterprises have been migrating Unified Communications & Collaboration applications to datacenters - private clouds - for the past few years. With this move comes the opportunity to leverage da

May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.