SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Gary Audin
Gary Audin is the President of Delphi, Inc. He has more than 40 years of computer, communications and security...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Gary Audin | September 28, 2011 |

 
   

Third Party Maintenance; The Right Choice?

Third Party Maintenance; The Right Choice? Going with TPM may be considered a risk. It really is not. There are values of third party maintenance that go beyond reducing cost.

Going with TPM may be considered a risk. It really is not. There are values of third party maintenance that go beyond reducing cost.

In today's IT and communication environment, money is tight. Maintaining the installed technologies is a must. Looking forward, the TCO looks like it cannot be reduced. Retiring equipment and software is one choice and can work when the workforce is downsized. This helps a little, but there are always minimum system requirements even when there are fewer users.

Your budget is slim. You need to look at cost cutting alternatives. One candidate is maintenance. You can:

* Stay with your OEM
* Upgrade or replace the technology to reduce maintenance costs with the OEM or
* Look at third-party maintenance

Professionals who are used to long-term operation of systems like a TDM PBX have been able to avoid new purchases because of the support provided by the OEMs. These OEMs, in the past, allowed the customer to keep, operate and upgrade their systems at the user's own pace.

Enterprises that do not have the capital to replace the older technologies want to extend their system's life. The OEM, on the other hand, is trying to force customers to replace their aging technologies. In some cases, this is accomplished by informing the customer that maintenance will be terminated on the enterprise’s existing systems, forcing the purchase of new systems.

Going with the third party maintenance (TPM) organization may be considered a risk. It really is not. There are values of third party maintenance that go beyond reducing cost. The enterprise can:

* Design a custom contract that meets their requirements rather than accepting the cookie-cutter approach of the OEM.
* Receive more personalized service.
* Avoid unnecessary costly upgrades that may be pushed by the OEM.
* Provide a contract that covers multiple products from different OEM vendors, thereby increasing the customer's maintenance efficiency and offering a single point of contact.
* Extend the life of the aging systems, thereby avoiding new capital expenses.
* Avoid hidden fees.
* Receive an unbiased assessment of the exiting systems and their potential for continued operation and support.

The market that has developed for TPM has become multi-tiered in operation. The largest TPMs offer one stop shopping to their customers. This type of TPM already has many partnerships, a large staff covering a wide geographic area, and is supporting many types of customers.

The medium sized TPM may have nearly as much capability as the large TPM, but may be limited in geographic coverage. This TPM commonly pursues government contracts for maintenance.

The small TPM is probably the most flexible in its offerings. When the enterprise is not geographically dispersed, then this size TPM may be just as attractive as a larger TPM. The executives of this type of TPM are usually more focused on the customer and work more closely with the customer to ensure satisfaction and loyalty.

If the customer has selected products primarily from one OEM, then the boutique TPM may be the best choice. This TPM is more specialized in one OEM product line and may have engineers that have come directly from the OEM that they support. Spare parts for these OEM products may be more readily available from the boutique TPM because of their limited focus.

There are two types of maintenance agreements. The on-site agreement has the technician arriving at the customer premises, diagnosing the problem, either replacing the part or fixing the software or ordering the parts and installing them when they arrive.

The second form is depot maintenance. In this case the enterprise has to diagnose the problem, contact the service company and order the replacements to be shipped. The enterprise staff has to perform the installation and then ship back the defective parts. This is less costly, but it’s time consuming and assumes the enterprise has the necessary expertise.

What if the enterprise chooses to have the TPM or OEM on call rather than a contract relationship? The costs can be very high. It is common to pay $150/hour to resolve the problem with a TPM. This does not include parts. OEM rates can be as high as $350/hour plus parts.

It is a money decision in the end. The enterprise wants to maintain the systems but also reduce costs and make the maintenance costs a predictable budget item. Going with a TPM should be analyzed when the enterprise comes to the end of the present OEM maintenance contract.





COMMENTS



August 16, 2017

Contact centers have long been at the leading edge of innovation in communications technology, given their promise of measurable ROI and the continual need to optimize customer interactions and sta

July 12, 2017

Enterprises have been migrating Unified Communications & Collaboration applications to datacenters - private clouds - for the past few years. With this move comes the opportunity to leverage da

May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.