SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Melanie Turek
Melanie Turek is Vice President, Research at Frost & Sullivan. She is a renowned expert in unified communications, collaboration, social...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Melanie Turek | June 30, 2011 |

 
   

Lowest Common Denominator Gets a Bad Rap

Lowest Common Denominator Gets a Bad Rap If everyone is on a phone or web call, everyone suffers the same participation limitations; if some are on video or telepresence, they get a communications advantage.

If everyone is on a phone or web call, everyone suffers the same participation limitations; if some are on video or telepresence, they get a communications advantage.

I have often wondered why the vendors that sell unified communications solutions don't use them more often in their daily interactions with the analyst community. Many's the time I've been invited to participate in an analyst briefing, only to receive the slides in advance of the call, via email, with the briefing itself conducted via audio conference. Often, I participate in calls about the value of video conferencing, with no video actually in use.

But the truth is, such retro meetings probably better serve a large portion of the audience than a full-fledged UC affair would. After all, analysts travel--a lot--and we are always touting the value of the mobile workplace. But rarely are the web conferencing services I'm invited to available on my Android device, which leaves me calling into an audio conference--and thankful for the dial-in details and the pre-distributed PowerPoint deck (at least I can read PDFs on my phone).

There was a brief moment in time about 12 months ago when vendors seemed so enamored of the VoIP audio available in their web conferencing applications that they refused to send separate dial-in details unless specifically asked--a request that often came at the last minute from me, when I realized somewhere in an airport lounge or conference hallway that I didn't have the info I needed to simply dial in. (Avaya’s web.alive doesn't even have the option of synching with audio-only calls, which means if you're not near a PC, you can't participate.)

Now comes Cisco, with its recent decision to offer all its analyst calls via telepresence. On the surface, it sounds like a good idea--and it's certainly an understandable one. Cisco has a business interest in pushing the value of telepresence, which does improve the meeting experience substantially, and its systems are impressive. Why not show them off and leverage the advantages of immersive video in one fell swoop? And the vendor is inclusive, too--it lets analysts who don't live near a Cisco telepresence room dial in via WebEx or telephone.

Since I live in a small town in Colorado, I am three hours from the nearest Cisco telepresence system, so that option is out for me. Instead, I participate in these sessions via WebEx when I can, and on my phone when I'm not near a PC with an Internet connection. But the results have been disappointing.

I have now attended several Cisco meetings in which some participants join via telepresence (a few of whom seem to be in the same room as the Cisco people), others via WebEx, and a small number via phone. To someone not participating via video, these calls feel very disconnected, even unwelcoming. What seems to happen is, the people in the room with the Cisco people dominate the conversation, followed by people in other telepresence rooms. It’s hard for WebEx and phone participants to join in without feeling like they are "interrupting" the conversation. (Also, it always takes several minutes for the people in the telepresence rooms to come online and get everything working as it should, leaving web and audio participants listening to dead silence, or the distant background noise of a roomful of people speaking among themselves.)

Working teams--people who know each other well and have spent hours, days or even years interacting on a regular basis--can take advantage of the latest and greatest technology in a mixed environment with good results, since even low-tech participants feel comfortable speaking up, and they can clue into the conversations taking place in the background. But when it comes to meetings of relative strangers, I really think you have to democratize the medium--i.e. have everyone join by WebEx or phone (the two are easily integrated at this point, although Microsoft has the unfortunate habit of taking questions only via online chat), or have everyone join by telepresence. If you choose the latter, you will obviously lose participants who cannot reach a conference room, but the experience would be better for those who can.

If everyone is on a phone or web call, everyone suffers the same participation limitations; if some people are on video or telepresence, they get a communications advantage. Vendors spend a lot of time these days talking about cross-platform and device compatibility, meaning that "everyone" can join a collaboration session, regardless of the device they're using or the connection to the Internet at their disposal. But while the technology may be there, the sociology isn't--and maybe it never will be.





COMMENTS



August 16, 2017

Contact centers have long been at the leading edge of innovation in communications technology, given their promise of measurable ROI and the continual need to optimize customer interactions and sta

July 12, 2017

Enterprises have been migrating Unified Communications & Collaboration applications to datacenters - private clouds - for the past few years. With this move comes the opportunity to leverage da

May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.