Alan Percy
Alan Percy is Senior Director of Product Marketing at Dialogic, responsible for marketing of the the company's media server and...
Read Full Bio >>

Alan Percy | May 05, 2011 |


SIP Trunking and UC: What is the Role of an Enterprise SBC?

SIP Trunking and UC: What is the Role of an Enterprise SBC? Session border controllers help with interoperability, security, and dealing with upgrades.

Session border controllers help with interoperability, security, and dealing with upgrades.

An E-SBC (enterprise session border controller) plays a number of important roles when integrating SIP Trunking service providers to SIP-based enterprise Unified Communications systems including Microsoft Lync, Avaya Aura, IBM Sametime Unified Telephony (SUT) and others:

1. Interoperability--Using the Back-to-Back User Agent (B2BUA) features of an E-SBC can solve many of the interoperability issues that exist between systems today. In this role, each SIP session is terminated and re-established on the other side, allowing format difference between the two systems to be corrected. Beyond issues at the signaling plane, E-SBCs can resolve media differences with transcoding of voice, fax and DTMF tones. Resolving interoperability issues significantly expands the range of choices for the enterprise when selecting SIP Trunking services--this in turn gives greater negotiating power and flexibility.

2. Dealing with Upgrades--An often overlooked issue with interoperability is system upgrades. Sure as death and taxes, the UC vendors will be making new versions of their products, and it's highly unlikely the upgrades will be coordinated with all the SIP Trunking service providers. With the B2BUA, adjustments can be made on the UC application side while leaving the SIP Trunking service provider side untouched (or vice versa). If you connect the two systems directly and there is an interoperability issue, you'll have to wait for one of the two vendors to correct the issue. Unfortunately, most UC vendors are overwhelmed with new product feature development--leaving most of the interoperability work to the field to correct.

3. Security--Using an E-SBC between two SIP-based communications systems also offers additional security. Even in situations where MPLS or VPN technologies are used, E-SBCs can act to protect one part of the system if there is a breach elsewhere. A common attack is the Registration Flood, causing the UC software to do exhaustive databases looksups just to find out that a registration attempt is bogus. Send enough bad registration attempts to any SIP Registrar fast enough, and the invader can slow or even crash important communications systems. E-SBCs watch for patterns in registrations and can shut them out before they ever get to the UC application.


October 14, 2015
Service providers have been touting SIP Trunking for nearly two decades as a better alternative to PRIs, because of cost savings, flexible routing and better handling at peak load. Yet over 50% of ent...
September 22, 2015
SIP Trunking services are maturing, and enterprises, in turn, continue to increase their deployment of SIP Trunks as a way of saving money over legacy PRIs. But SIP Trunking isn't an end in itself; S...
August 26, 2015
Turning the current flood of available data into meaningful intelligence requires business leaders to look beyond the traditional data center toward technologies like cloud, automation, virtualization...