SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Jim Blaszak
SHARE



Jim Blaszak | January 30, 2008 |

 
   

Fighting Back-Billing

Fighting Back-Billing This article was written by Justin G. Castillo, partner at Levine, Blaszak, Block & Boothby law firm Suppose your next invoice from your telecom carrier contains a surprise: back billing for over two years' worth of previously-unbilled charges. You dispute the back-billed charges, but the carrier insists that its back-billing is lawful. What are your rights? How much of the back-billed charges (if any) must you pay?

This article was written by Justin G. Castillo, partner at Levine, Blaszak, Block & Boothby law firm Suppose your next invoice from your telecom carrier contains a surprise: back billing for over two years' worth of previously-unbilled charges. You dispute the back-billed charges, but the carrier insists that its back-billing is lawful. What are your rights? How much of the back-billed charges (if any) must you pay?

This article was written by Justin G. Castillo, partner at Levine, Blaszak, Block & Boothby law firm

Suppose your next invoice from your telecom carrier contains a surprise: back billing for over two years' worth of previously-unbilled charges. You dispute the back-billed charges, but the carrier insists that its back-billing is lawful.

What are your rights? How much of the back-billed charges (if any) must you pay?The Nature and Threat of Back-Billing Back billing refers to a delay between the time when a carrier should have billed for service (usually the next billing cycle) and when it actually does bill for the service. Although often associated with usage-based services (e.g., voice minutes), back billing can show up anywhere. In one "real-world" example we've dealt with, an RBOC installed and provided SS7 services in one case and interstate private line in another, but failed to bill the services for several months. In another instance, an IXC and its customer were negotiating renewal of an expired frame relay contract, and during the negotiation period, the carrier continued to provide service at contract rates. Shortly after negotiations failed, however, the IXC re-rated the services and back billed the customer for the difference between base rates and contract rates back to the date of contract expiration.

What Are the Rules? The rules governing back billing vary by jurisdiction and service type: regulated services can be governed either by the FCC or the applicable state public utility authority, while unregulated services may be subject to traditional state contract law (including statutes of limitation). This article concentrates on services regulated by the FCC.

Under the Communications Act, a carrier's charges, practices, classifications and regulations must be "just and reasonable." Back billing can violate the Act if it rises to the level of being an "unjust and unreasonable" practice. In 1989, the FCC ruled that "back billing may under certain circumstances constitute an unjust and unreasonable practice . . . . and that Section 415 [the Act's two-year limitations period] does not authorize back billing for any particular period." Unfortunately, the FCC declined to create a bright-line rule (such as 60 or 180 days) for determining when back billing becomes unlawful. Instead, it announced that it would resolve such disputes on a case-by-case basis.

Over the years, the FCC wrestled with a variety of back billing scenarios. Here are several key factors discussed in those cases that you should consider when evaluating a specific situation:

The Back Billing Interval: The carrier's chances of collecting charges are inversely related to the length of the back billing interval. Absent extraordinary circumstances, a carrier trying to back bill for two years (or more) would almost certainly lose. On the other hand, the FCC has allowed back billing of up to 160 days in some circumstances (and has stated that even longer intervals might be lawful). Under existing FCC decisions, back billing within the 60-180-day range is a "grey area" that makes it difficult to predict the outcome of a dispute. Ultimately, however, the lawfulness of the back billing will turn on the specific facts.

Does the Customer Compete with the Carrier or have End-Users? If the customer is billing the service to other users (e.g., as a reseller, systems integrator or other service provider), the FCC will consider the impact of the back billing on the customer and its relationship with end users (especially if the customer cannot pass on the back-billed charges).

Contractual Considerations. Have the parties addressed back billing in their agreement? If so, the FCC will give great weight to those provisions because it believes that sophisticated customers can protect themselves in the marketplace.

The Nature and Extent of the Back Billing. Back billing caused by a one-time computer error that was quickly repaired is more likely to be allowed than chronic back billing resulting from systemic problems. The FCC will also take into account whether and how the carrier notified customers and whether the carrier tried to mitigate the impact of the back billing (e.g. by offering offsetting credits).

How to Respond to Back Billing If a carrier back bills you, dispute the charges in writing and get a written explanation of the back billing. Do your homework: research the facts, read your contract (including the billing and dispute resolution clauses along with the applicable tariffs and service guides) and determine who has jurisdiction over the services. Escalate and document the dispute quickly -- talking to someone who understands back billing will be far more productive than yelling at your account rep.

If writing and talking fail, enlist the help of someone who understands applicable procedures, regulations, statutes and case law. State agencies and the FCC offer a variety of cost-effective dispute resolution tools ranging from informal mediation to full-blown hearings. Carriers are far more reasonable in settlement talks when there is a regulator in the room. Disputing unreasonable back billing in this way (as opposed to in court) may be quite cost-effective.

Managing Back Billing Risk in Your Next Contract Many carriers try to persuade unwary customers to agree to curtail their back billing rights. Some carriers' service guides allow back billing for up to two years (other, less shameless carriers draw the line at 180 days). Customers that fail to override such provisions in their contracts with the carriers will not be able to blame a rigid tariff regime. If a dispute arises, the carrier will argue (perhaps with some justification) that the customer "agreed" to the back billing provision.

Customers that try to negotiate reasonable back billing clauses also face challenges. Carriers will agree to add a provision barring back billing beyond 160 days. In the name of "mutuality," however, they will insist that the customer agree in return to waive its right to recover any overcharges if it does not seek a refund within 160 days of the invoice date. This is a cynical ploy, as the customer is giving up its statutory right to dispute bills within two years in exchange for little or nothing because in many instances back billing beyond 160 days would be unlawful if contested. But as noted above, the authorities will be inclined to enforce such "agreements."

Conclusion Back billing is a serious problem for enterprise customers because of the amount of money at stake. Carriers will continue to try to back bill their customers for the longest possible interval. As always, the best way to counter these ploys is to negotiate fair agreements and assert their rights when pushed by their suppliers.





COMMENTS



May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

April 19, 2017

Now more than ever, enterprise contact centers have a unique opportunity to lead the way towards complete, digital transformation. Moving your contact center to the cloud is a starting point, quick

April 5, 2017

Its no secret that the cloud offers significant benefits to enterprises - including cost reduction, scalability, higher efficiency, and more flexibility. If your phone system and contact center are

June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.