Eric Krapf

Eric Krapf | May 26, 2008 |


Interoperability in IP Telephony and Unified Communications

Interoperability in IP Telephony and Unified Communications The obstacles to true multi-vendor interoperability are numerous and large. It's not at all certain they can be overcome.

The obstacles to true multi-vendor interoperability are numerous and large. It's not at all certain they can be overcome.

As enterprise real-time communications moves from a hardware to a software architecture model, the issue of interoperability has come to the fore. Enterprise telecom departments traditionally have had to support multiple vendors’ PBXs within their networks, and have been frustrated by these systems’ limited ability to support common features and functionality across different vendor platforms. One of the key benefits of moving to a software model is supposed to be that this new model could more easily and effectively support a multi-vendor environment.

Mark Straton, senior VP at Siemens Communications, explains that customers have a “huge amount of leverage” when [interoperable software] systems are deployed on common off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware,” and he adds that there are “huge economies in getting [vendors] to specialize on components.”

The most important driver of the issue now is the entry of Microsoft and IBM into the communications space, and the role that these two companies’ systems are expected to play in this new software-based communications architecture. At VoiceCon Orlando in March, representatives of the two vendors shook hands and agreed to work on aspects of the interoperability challenge (more about that later in this article). However, the attitude held by several of Microsoft’s (and IBM’s) competitors on that VoiceCon stage can be summed up in a No Jitter comment posted by a commenter with the handle, “Bithead:”

They [Microsoft] have come to the market touting a unique software-based architecture, and in doing so they should be able to claim an openness that far surpasses that of traditional vendors. What I see is the opposite…. Ultimately we should be looking at architecture and how they drive the ultimate value for customers.

So what’s really involved in getting to a real-time architecture in which multi-vendor interoperability is possible and can support meaningful enterprise features and functions? And then what needs to happen to actually bring about such interoperability?

A big picture view would place communications systems within the larger context of the entire enterprise IT infrastructure. It envisions a world where there’s interoperability not only among different pieces of communications gear, but between communications gear and other business process applications. I’ve tried to give a general sense of these different levels of interoperability in a recent No Jitter blog post .

However, this Feature article will be limited to three major interoperability challenges within the communications level of the architecture, and won’t touch on the “levels of interoperability” challenge in the blog post cited above. We’ll look at the multi-layered challenge in future coverage, but there’s way more just at the communications level than you can deal with in a single article.

The three areas of focus for this article are:

1.) The effort to use SIP to standardize legacy PBX functions in new IP-based PBXs.
2.) The issue of codecs, and their implications for interoperability.
3.) Presence federation.

These are not identical kinds of challenges: Number 1 is a pretty straightforward problem of writing standards that will cover implementation scenarios such that a vendor’s assurance of standards compliance will, in the real world, mean that the vendor’s product actually does “plug and play” with another vendor who claims their product also meets the standard. Actually, this is a straightforward statement of the problem, but the problem itself is anything but straightforward, as you’ll see.

Number 2 has to do with how interoperability is playing out in the real world, in one specific area where clear standards exist and are, in fact, widely implemented in an interoperable fashion--and where there is, nevertheless, debate over whether one vendor (Microsoft) is violating some tenets of interoperability.

Number 3 represents an area where there an ongoing effort to attain interoperability, but where there are also serious underlying technical/conceptual hurdles to overcome before a framework for multi-vendor interoperability can even be realized.

[You can discuss/comment on this article in the Comments section here.]


April 19, 2017

Now more than ever, enterprise contact centers have a unique opportunity to lead the way towards complete, digital transformation. Moving your contact center to the cloud is a starting point, quick

April 5, 2017

Its no secret that the cloud offers significant benefits to enterprises - including cost reduction, scalability, higher efficiency, and more flexibility. If your phone system and contact center are

March 22, 2017

As today's competitive business environments push workforces into overdrive, many enterprises are seeking ways of streamlining workflows while optimizing productivity, business agility, and speed.

April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.