ABOUT THE AUTHOR


John Malone
SHARE



John Malone | October 20, 2009 |

 
   

Open Source PBX vs. Conventional PBX/Key: Battle Lines Drawn

Open Source PBX vs. Conventional PBX/Key: Battle Lines Drawn Eastern Management Group asked open source PBX customers about their decision-making. In Part 1 of a two-part article, we learn that most open source customers do consider multiple proprietary systems as alternative choices.

Eastern Management Group asked open source PBX customers about their decision-making. In Part 1 of a two-part article, we learn that most open source customers do consider multiple proprietary systems as alternative choices.

The market for proprietary PBX systems showed just modest signs of being on the road to recovery in the first half of 2009.

By contrast, Open Source PBX systems delivered an astounding 30 percent growth during the same period.

Does the proprietary PBX market eventually recover, retain its 82 percent market share, and peacefully coexist with Open Source PBXs, which today hold the remaining 18 percent ? Increasingly it's looking like the answer could be no. Our research shows increasing evidence that Open Source and proprietary PBXs are engaged in a heated battle similar in respects to early Linux and Microsoft server wars, with the proprietary PBX giving up ground, at least for now. Over time we conclude the business model for both groups requires significant tuning.

Today several opinions converge to dissuade proprietary PBX companies from looking over their shoulder and reassessing their game plan even in the face of bold Open Source inroads. Our research shows these are among the strongest held opinions:

* Only technology companies are Open Source users

* Open Source systems in deployment are only small configurations

* Most Open Source PBXs are in test and not production environments

* Open Source PBXs do not "show up" in bid situations

Our research of over 7,000 enterprises (small through large) provides convincing evidence that these opinions are mistaken.

The report "Open Source PBX Market Size, Forecast and Analysis," published by Eastern Management, addresses these points. The question of whether Proprietary PBXs are found to compete for deals against Open Source PBXs is the subject we address in this article.

Our worldwide research finds 51 percent of companies that acquire an Open Source PBX scrutinize proprietary PBX alternatives prior to making a decision.

There are some interesting characteristics about this inquisitive group of Open Source PBX purchasers.

First, the Open Source PBX systems these customers purchase are large when compared with overall market averages. At an average of 147 station lines, they have four times the number of stations of the typical Open Source PBX. That also makes these systems 50 percent larger than the average proprietary PBX sold today. This is larger too than the average PBX sold by any of the top 10 conventional PBX companies.

Second, as businesses acquire more Open Source PBXs over time, they are more inclined to consider a proprietary PBX option. This is paradoxical. It's also an important piece of the puzzle for conventional PBX manufacturers that assess Open Source challenges. For example, companies buying their first Open Source PBX seriously look at proprietary alternatives 48 percent of the time. Those installing an Open Source PBX for the second time look at the proprietary options 53 percent of the time.

Curiously, the number of proprietary PBXs examined tends to increase with customer experience, from 2.17 proprietary PBXs evaluated by first time Open Source customers, to 2.20 for those on their second Open Source PBX. For the universe of Open Source customers, 2.24 proprietary PBXs are vetted before a business selects Open Source. This last number makes the point that the more Open Source experience gained, the more proprietary PBX options are explored.



COMMENTS




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Did you know you can style comments using HTML tags and upload your avatar photo? To upload your avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. Once your profile is complete, you may add your avatar photo. (Hide this hint)

Sign up to the No Jitter email newsletters

  • Catch up with the blogs, features and columns from No Jitter, the online community for the IP communications industry. Each Thursday, we'll send you a synopsis of the high-impact articles, podcasts and other material posted to No Jitter that week, with links for quick access.

  • A quick hit of original analysis by the experts who bring you Enterprise Connect, the leading event in Enterprise Communications & Collaboration. Each Wednesday, this enewsletter delivers to your email box a thought-provoking, objective take on the latest news and trends in the industry.

Your email address is required for membership. For details about the user information, please read the UBM Privacy Statement

As an added benefit, would you like to receive relevant 3rd party offers about new products/services and discounted offers via email? Yes

* = Required Field
Enterprise Connect Orlando 2012
Enterprise Connect is proud to announce the following industry leaders will deliver keynote addresses at Enterprise Connect Orlando:
--Steven J. Bandrowczak, Vice President & General Manager, Avaya Networking
--OJ Winge, Senior VP/GM,Video & Collaboration, Cisco
--Kirk Koenigsbauer, Corporate VP, Office Business Group, Microsoft
--Alistair Rennie, GM, Lotus Software and Collaboration Solutions, IBM Software Group
Enterprise Connect Webinars
Wednesday, Nov. 30, 2 PM EST/11 AM PST

This presentation reviews best practices and tools for implementing data center clouds, including how to pin-point and resolve problems, and minimize cost while maximizing performance and usability.
Virtual Enterprise Connect
This in-depth Virtual Event will feature detailed presentations by technology experts who can help you plan your Lync-based UC migration and get the most out of all that Lync has to offer..
Enterprise Connect Orlando 2012
The Enterprise Connect conference program has been published! Our confernce is designed with one over-riding objective: To help you make the best decisions as you migrate your enterprise communications and collaboration.
Trending Now
Upcoming Events
February 15, 2012
For employees away from the office—whether on the go, at a remote location, or telecommuting from home—success depends on connecting the right people with the right information anywhere to a...
February 1, 2012
Have your video implementation projects fallen short of your expectations in user satisfaction or utilization? Reaping the benefits depends on not only on selecting the technology, but on careful plan...
January 18, 2012
As your enterprise moves into its Unified Communications migration, you’ll need to meet short-, medium- and long-term goals that provide investment protection, return on investment, and real bus...