SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Allan Sulkin
Allan Sulkin, president and founder of TEQConsult Group (1986), is widely recognized as the industry's foremost enterprise communications market/product analyst....
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Allan Sulkin | July 21, 2009 |

 
   

The Motivating Reason Behind the Avaya Bid for Nortel ES?

The Motivating Reason Behind the Avaya Bid for Nortel ES? Most of the analysis and commentary has been about market issues. It's also just as important to look at the long term financial implications for Avaya's owners.

Most of the analysis and commentary has been about market issues. It's also just as important to look at the long term financial implications for Avaya's owners.

If Avaya is successful in its attempt to acquire Nortel's enterprise business it will effectively double the size of its installed customer base, almost double its global market of annual CPE line shipments, improve its market coverage through additional partner channels, and significantly expand the size of its product portfolio. These have been the most commonly touted results of a merger between two of the world's leading suppliers of enterprise communications systems, but there may be an even more important reason behind Avaya's "stalking horse" bid, one that is almost purely financially motivated.Silver Lake/TPG paid $8.2 billion for Avaya in a leveraged buyout two years ago, a sum only fractionally offset by Avaya's cash assets at the time. The purchase price was about 1.5 times the company's revenues at the time. I personally think that the private equity firms overpaid by a few billion dollars, for a variety of reasons, chief among them the specter of two deadly competitors. Two years ago Cisco had supplanted Avaya as the North American market leader in terms of line station shipments and had strong momentum to increase its market share lead going into the future (as has been the case). During VoiceCon Orlando earlier that year Jeff Raikes, then President of the Microsoft Business Division, announced the imminent release of Office Communications Server 2007 public beta and outlined Microsoft's intentions to enter the voice communications market by unifying communications through its software solution. Avaya's best days may have been behind them, unless something dramatic was fated to take place.

The financial implosion of Nortel and the subsequent filing for bankruptcy created the opportunity for Avaya to acquire the Canadian-based company's enterprise business operations at a fire sale-like price. Avaya's "stalking horse" bid of $475 million is less than one third of this year's projected Nortel ES annual revenues. Nortel ES revenues have declined significantly during the past two years, devaluing the business unit substantially. There are several reasons for the decline, but one has been beyond Nortel's control, the economy. The economy is forecast to improve during the next year and contribute to stronger market revenues. During yesterday's webcast to industry analysts and consultants Joel Hackney, President of Nortel ES, said that their revenue situation improved during the past fiscal quarter compared to the previous quarter. If revenues for Nortel ES operations hold steady or increase during the next two years that could be a financial bonanza for Avaya's owners who plan to take the company public, again, when circumstances are more favorable than today.

During last year's Avaya industry analyst meeting a Silver Lake executive explicitly said that the strategic plan was to take the system supplier public, again, after a few years of revenues growth at a higher offering price than originally paid, similarly to how they handled their Seagate Technology investment. I don't think Silver Lake or TPG knew at the time that there would be dire eonomic times ahead that would significantly shrink the size of the market and resulting Avaya revenues. Avaya revenues very slightly declined during its last fiscal year and will decline measurably the current fiscal year (discounting Nortel ES revnenues if the acquisition goes through). The downward financial situation puts a major crimp in earlier plans to go public, likely delaying it two yars or more from an original time schedule.

Buying Nortel ES can significantly ease an Avaya public offering for several reasons:

* Unless the merged company completely implodes it would be able to state in an SEC filing that it was the North American and global market leader in enterprise communications by almost any important metic (revenues, shipments, installed custome base), something that would appreciably help support a targeted public offering price per share;

* The combined revenues of the two organizations would demand a higher market capitalization price based on a greater multiple than the Nortel ES acqusiition factor: a multiplier factor of only one times sales would increase the current market value of Nortel ES revenues by about $1 billion (a nice tidy sum)

* The merged entity would presumably be a stronger competitor against Cisco, Microsoft and the rest of the field.

Without Nortel ES there is little probability that Avaya's market capitalization could remotely approach $8.2 billion in the foreseeable future (unless the financial market turns so bullish that stock prices soar beyond previous highs, not a likely scenario during the next few years). If Microsoft successfully implements its planned OCS strategy and makes strong inroads into the market for enterprise voice communications Avaya has a lot to lose in terms of installed base and revenues. If Google enters the market sometime down the road with a Cloud-based solution it would further erode Avaya's market position in the long run. And Cisco is likely to continue increasing its market share at the expense of the compeition, Avaya included. The sooner Avaya is taken public again, the better for Silver Lake/TPG. The Nortel ES acquisition may be the only quick fix available to cut losses while they can. I seriously doubt that Avaya will go into a tailspin, go bankrupt and lose almost all of its market value, but there is a strong probability that it will be worth a fraction of its earlier high value in five or ten years.

Most of the analysis and commentary centering around the Avaya "stalking horse" bid for Nortel ES has been about market issues. It's also just as important to look at the long term financial implications for Avaya's owners, Silver Lake, TPG and the investors the two private equity firms. The two most recent sales of name brand enterprise communications system suppliers, Ericsson and Siemens, were at bargain basement prices. It appears that Silver Lake/TPG hopes to reverse this trend with Avaya using its acquisition of Nortel ES as an increased market value generator. If the merger of the organizations, products, and channels goes smoothly then there is a chance for the larger company to recapture lost market share and grow in the future. Any difficulties would mean loss of big dollars, more than the acquisition price of Nortel ES itself.

The primary business objective of Avaya is to remain a competitive supplier of enterprise communications products and services tomorrrow and for generations to come; the primary business objective of private equity firms is to generate targeted returns on investment, the sooner the better. The two objectives do occasionally intersect, but are not identical. This must be taken into account anytime there are large sums of money at stake. Improved market dynamics resulting form a merger of Avaya and Nortel ES operations are important, but financial results for the stakeholders are usually more important. And don't forget that top Avaya executives at the time of the acquisition two years ago were required to invest a sizable portion of their multimillion dollar proceeds from the sale back into the company. Money is always a great motivator for doing business.Most of the analysis and commentary has been about market issues. It's also just as important to look at the long term financial implications for Avaya's owners.





COMMENTS



August 16, 2017

Contact centers have long been at the leading edge of innovation in communications technology, given their promise of measurable ROI and the continual need to optimize customer interactions and sta

July 12, 2017

Enterprises have been migrating Unified Communications & Collaboration applications to datacenters - private clouds - for the past few years. With this move comes the opportunity to leverage da

May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

August 16, 2017
World Vision U.S. is finding lots of goodness in RingCentral's cloud communications service, but as Randy Boyd, infrastructure architect at the global humanitarian nonprofit, tells us, he and his team....
August 11, 2017
Alicia Gee, director of unified communications at Sutter Physician Services, oversees the technical team supporting a 1,000-agent contact center running on Genesys PureConnect. She catches us up on th....
August 4, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, has lately been working on integrating enterprise communications into Internet of Things ecosystems. He shares examples and off....
July 27, 2017
Industry watcher Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares her perspective on this acquisition, discussing Mitel's market positioning, why the move makes sense, and more.
July 14, 2017
Lantre Barr, founder and CEO of Blacc Spot Media, urges any enterprise that's been on the fence about integrating real-time communications into business workflows to jump off and get started. Tune and....
June 28, 2017
Communications expert Tsahi Levent-Levi, author of the popular BlogGeek.me blog, keeps a running tally and comprehensive overview of communications platform-as-a-service offerings in his "Choosing a W....
June 9, 2017
If you think telecom expense management applies to nothing more than business phone lines, think again. Hyoun Park, founder and principal investigator with technology advisory Amalgam Insights, tells ....
June 2, 2017
Enterprises strategizing on mobility today, including for internal collaboration, don't have the luxury of learning as they go. Tony Rizzo, enterprise mobility specialist with Blue Hill Research, expl....
May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.