SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Zeus Kerravala
Zeus Kerravala is the founder and principal analyst with ZK Research. Kerravala provides a mix of tactical advice to help his...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Zeus Kerravala | August 04, 2008 |

 
   

The Industry Should Learn From Alcatel-Lucent

The Industry Should Learn From Alcatel-Lucent Earlier this week Alcatel-Lucent announced that CEO Pat Russo and chairman, Serge the Merge Tchuruk would be leaving the organization. The departures of these executives were no real surprise to people that have followed "Lucatel" since the two companies merged. Russo and Tchuruk were the main driving forces in the merger, which hasn't yielded near the results that they had initially predicted.

Earlier this week Alcatel-Lucent announced that CEO Pat Russo and chairman, Serge the Merge Tchuruk would be leaving the organization. The departures of these executives were no real surprise to people that have followed "Lucatel" since the two companies merged. Russo and Tchuruk were the main driving forces in the merger, which hasn't yielded near the results that they had initially predicted.

Earlier this week Alcatel-Lucent announced that CEO Pat Russo and chairman, Serge the Merge Tchuruk would be leaving the organization. The departures of these executives were no real surprise to people that have followed "Lucatel" since the two companies merged. Russo and Tchuruk were the main driving forces in the merger, which hasn't yielded near the results that they had initially predicted.This merger was doomed from the beginning and it should be a good lesson learned for the rest of the industry. In my mind, there are really only two reasons that mergers and acquisitions like this happen. One is to innovate and the other is to consolidate. Cisco is probably the king of acquire to innovate. Every acquisition that Cisco makes delivers new skills, technologies or capabilities that Cisco can move into its enormous distribution channel, and the majority of Cisco's purchases are successful.

Obviously, this type of merger doesn't always work. For example, Juniper acquired Peribit and Redline, which brought new technology to Juniper. Since then, Redline has been shut down and Peribit, despite how good that product is and how hot the market is, continues to struggle.

Acquisitions for consolidation purposes are done to take two smaller companies and make a bigger one with less net overhead than the two separate companies. The resulting merged entity has more market share with less overhead and can compete better. Make sense? The fact is that acquisition for consolidation rarely works as planned. Think back to HP Compaq. Similar to what happened to Russo, that merger cost Carly her job.

So let's look at the main reasons that I think consolidation purchases do not work. First, there are reasons both companies want to merge. Something has happened in the market to put both organizations in a position of weakness where they felt they had to merge. Think about it: if both Alcatel and Lucent had being flying high, there would be no reason to merge. Both companies would be more likely to compete than to merge. In this case, the market had transitioned away from many of the legacy products that both companies sold and was rapidly shifting to IP, which Cisco and Juniper dominate. The combined Alcatel-Lucent entity had a number of "next generation" products such as Alcatel's edge router, IMS systems, softswitches, etc but both businesses were in that 'transition' phase when the merger occurred.

Another difficult situation with acquisitions for consolidation is the complexity of the merger itself. If it's a consolidation play, then it's likely there is some product and R&D overlap. What products stay, which go, how does R&D gets structured, etc. In the meantime, while the restructuring is going on, often product innovation pauses while the company tries to determine how to rationalize the product set, what should stay or go, how it should be supported etc.

Culture always plays a role in large acquisitions. This happens more with consolidations since the two organizations are both likely to have its own culture that's well established. When companies acquire for innovation purposes, the acquired companies are often quite a bit smaller than the acquiring organization and it's easier for the company being acquired to adopt the culture of the "mother ship" rather than trying to convince a company that may have had some success on its own. In this case, it was a US company merging with a French company. At one time, Lucent was the darling of the US technology market and Alcatel has been that for France for a long time. Neither culture is better than the other -- they're just different. Getting US workers excited about working for a France headquartered company or vice versa is very difficult.

So you have two companies, headquarted on two continents, with vastly different cultures, going through the complexity of a merger in a transitioning market with customers that are also transitioning. That certainly does not sound like a recipe for success! If you look at many of the "consolidation" stories, many of them fail for the reasons I listed above. If they're going to work, the execution has to be perfect and it can't make up for years of companies being poorly managed.

I'm sure many of you reading this are thinking that this market does have to consolidate since we've got a consolidating customer base with all the telecom and wireless mergers. I agree that the market does need to rationalize down the number of players that are in it.

However, I do think we've had quite a bit of rationalization for consolidation already and its time this market started to rationalize through attrition and some of the weaker companies will start to die off instead of being brought into the fold of another weaker company. Moving forward, companies that are considering any kind of merger need to fix their own company before trying to integrate a second one into it. Two guys with broken legs with a rope around them still can't walk very well.





COMMENTS



May 31, 2017

In the days of old, people in suits used to meet at a boardroom table to update each other on their work. Including a remote colleague meant setting a conference phone on the table for in-person pa

April 19, 2017

Now more than ever, enterprise contact centers have a unique opportunity to lead the way towards complete, digital transformation. Moving your contact center to the cloud is a starting point, quick

April 5, 2017

Its no secret that the cloud offers significant benefits to enterprises - including cost reduction, scalability, higher efficiency, and more flexibility. If your phone system and contact center are

May 24, 2017
Mark Winther, head of IDC's global telecom consulting practice, gives us his take on how CPaaS providers evolve beyond the basic building blocks and address maturing enterprise needs.
May 18, 2017
Diane Myers, senior research director at IHS Markit, walks us through her 2017 UC-as-a-service report... and shares what might be to come in 2018.
April 28, 2017
Change isn't easy, but it is necessary. Tune in for advice and perspective from Zeus Kerravala, co-author of a "Digital Transformation for Dummies" special edition.
April 20, 2017
Robin Gareiss, president of Nemertes Research, shares insight gleaned from the firm's 12th annual UCC Total Cost of Operations study.
March 23, 2017
Tim Banting, of Current Analysis, gives us a peek into what the next three years will bring in advance of his Enterprise Connect session exploring the question: Will there be a new model for enterpris....
March 15, 2017
Andrew Prokop, communications evangelist with Arrow Systems Integration, discusses the evolving role of the all-important session border controller.
March 9, 2017
Organizer Alan Quayle gives us the lowdown on programmable communications and all you need to know about participating in this pre-Enterprise Connect hackathon.
March 3, 2017
From protecting against new vulnerabilities to keeping security assessments up to date, security consultant Mark Collier shares tips on how best to protect your UC systems.
February 24, 2017
UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
February 17, 2017
From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
February 7, 2017
UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
February 1, 2017
Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
January 26, 2017
Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
January 23, 2017
Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.