To help them through those challenges, enterprises are increasingly turning to Value-Added Resellers (VARs) and Systems Integrators (SIs). While the product vendors are obviously important, when an enterprise seeks to achieve the applications and results that UC promises, their progress often is largely dependent on the level of UC awareness and skill levels of the VAR or SI that is involved.
The best UC VARs/SIs have invested in the future on behalf of their enterprise customers and prospects and, of course, themselves. They've expanded their skills base and product lines; traditional telecom VARs/SIs are becoming partners of Microsoft or IBM, while IT-focused VARs/Sis are signing up to carry IP Telephony product lines. There is a growing cadre of experts who know how to deliver an effective communications assessment--what are the communications issues and opportunities--before they even begin to work on a network assessment or a bill of materials.
We saw about a dozen of these leading VARs/SIs at VoiceCon Orlando this past March, and I expect to see even more at VoiceCon San Francisco 2008 this November. Dimension Data announced its Unified Communications Deployment Model, which "helps organizations assess their competence and capabilities in the area of unified communications and develop a roadmap for UC implementation." INX, Spanlink, Accenture, Touchbase, CRI, SPS, Enabling Technologies, CommuniTech, and others have also been developing their UC practices to focus on the applications and business improvement opportunities, far beyond the basics of VOIP.
The bottom line is that your choice of VARs and SIs will be among the most important decisions you make as you proceed with UC. My advice is to get them involved as early as possible so you can tap their expertise as you develop your requirements, plans or RFPs. Some of attributes to consider as you make your selection are:
VARs and SIs usually sell specific brands of software and/or hardware, so there are still plenty of reasons to hire independent consultants to provide expertise, perspective, checks and balances, and negotiating leverage. Yet, I expect that my independent consulting peers will give you similar advice--the value you get from your UC investment will depend as much, if not more, on the quality of the VAR or SI that you hire as on the product brand being implemented.
What do you think? If you've had experiences--positive or not so much--with UC VARs and SIs, please drop me a note at MParker@UniCommConsulting.com
|
logon-to-comment
|
Quick View | Full View | 0 Comments |
This is a public forum. UBM TechWeb and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. UBM TechWeb makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.
Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of UBM TechWeb and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in UBM TechWeb's Terms of Service.
Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.
Focus: SIP Trunking
Featured Article: Under the Hood of Microsoft Communications Server 14
· CONTACT CENTERS Sponsored by
Webinar Replay: Contact Centers & Migration to IP
Recent blog: When Preparation Meets Opportunity in the World of Customer Care

No Jitter for quick reference. It's easy and free! CLICK HERE to register and get started!

