SHARE



ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Eric Krapf
Eric Krapf is General Manager and Program Co-Chair for Enterprise Connect, the leading conference/exhibition and online events brand in the...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Eric Krapf | April 24, 2008 |

 
   

Organizational Issues for Unified Communications

Organizational Issues for Unified Communications We've been talking to our friends at UCStrategies.com as we prepare for VoiceCon San Francisco, and one of the things we're trying to get our arms around is how the organizational challenges will play out as enterprises move from TDM to IP telephony to Unified Communications.

We've been talking to our friends at UCStrategies.com as we prepare for VoiceCon San Francisco, and one of the things we're trying to get our arms around is how the organizational challenges will play out as enterprises move from TDM to IP telephony to Unified Communications.

We've been talking to our friends at UCStrategies.com as we prepare for VoiceCon San Francisco, and one of the things we're trying to get our arms around is how the organizational challenges will play out as enterprises move from TDM to IP telephony to Unified Communications.Marty Parker of UCStrategies believes we ain't seen nothin' yet when it comes to organizational upheaval that's attributable to communications technology migrations (I'll get to more on Marty's views in a moment).

The first-generation organizational challenge was straightforward: Voice vs. Data. The old problem was that telecom people knew nothing about LANs, and LAN people knew nothing about telecom. Neither was interested in learning about the other, and mutual suspicion was the rule in many (though definitely not all) enterprises.

When VOIP first loomed over the enterprise, the assumption was that telecom people didn't want to put voice traffic on the data network because of the then-prevalent consensus that voice would sound bad on IP, and that LANs and servers had a tendency to crash, an attribute that was absent from TDM voice systems. It turned out that not only were the telecom people resistant; so were the data people. They didn't want that voice stuff mucking up their network, which carried a lot of traffic but did so with imperfect performance. They really didn't know what voice would do to their networks, but they weren't keen to find out.

Technology solved that problem, for the most part, and self-interest took care of the human side; voice people realized that TDM was a dead end and knowing at least something about switches and routers was a pretty good career move.

With the advent of Unified Communications, another set of IT people comes into the equation: Application/desktop people. If voice is going to be integrated into business process applications, and there's going to be a tighter integration between call control, presence management and messaging interfaces, this brings in a whole new set of people who previous handled these tasks with relative unconcern about real-time traffic.

In yesterday's AVST webinar on interoperability, Marty Parker sketched out what I think is a pretty groundbreaking analysis of how the organization may break down into a new set of layers as UC starts to permeate the enterprise. Marty segments it into three layers:

  • User Experience
  • Applications and Servers
  • Network

    I don't know that many enterprises are going to rush to formalize this kind of a change--for that matter, how many folks still have the world "telecom" in their titles? My research, gleaned from looking at people's badges at VoiceCon, indicates that the answer is, "Lots."

    But what it means to be a "telecom" person is different now than it used to be, and I'd be shocked to find any telecom person today who knows nothing about IP.

    In fact, telecom people's skills really plug them into all 3 of Marty's layers: You know User Experience; in fact many people have pointed out that one advantage telecom people have over datacom people is that the telecom department has a history of supporting the end user directly, and so has some built-in skills here. But of course the IP-PBX and other communications-related functionality will reside at the Applications and Servers layer, while the demands of QOS and network management will be met at the Network layer.

    Marty Parker predicts that the transition to this new structure will be enormously more disruptive to the organization than was the simple voice-data convergence. That may wind up being true, but I remember that voice-data divide as being a really big deal. I was in the audience and later on stage when old-time telecom people howled for blood when Cisco debated Nortel on the viability of IP-telephony. I conducted birds-of-a-feather sessions where open hostility was expressed from either side. It came almost as a revelation when Dave Stever from PPL, a Pennsylvania-based utility company, got on stage and described how he actually managed to successfully merge the voice and data divisions of his IT shop.

    So while the technical challenge of reorganizing for UC may outstrip the voice-data convergence challenge, I think people will be more open to the changes that will have to come, precisely because many of them lived through the voice-data convergence and wound up benefiting from it.





  • COMMENTS



    Enterprise Connect Orlando 2017
    March 27-30 | Orlando, FL
    Connect with the Entire Enterprise Communications & Collaboration Ecosystem


    Stay Up-to-Date: Hear industry visionaries in Keynotes and General Sessions delivering the latest insight on UC, mobility, collaboration and cloud

    Grow Your Network: Connect with the largest gathering of enterprise IT and business leaders and influencers

    Learn From Industry Leaders: Attend a full range of Conference Sessions, Free Programs and Special Events

    Evaluate All Your Options: Engage with 190+ of the leading equipment, software and service providers

    Have Fun! Mingle with sponsors, exhibitors, attendees, guest speakers and industry players during evening receptions

    Special Offer - Save $200 Off Advance Rates

    Register now with code NOJITTEREB to save $200 Off Advance Rates or get a FREE Expo Pass!

    March 8, 2017

    Enterprise IT's ability to innovate is critical to the success of the business -- 80% of CIOs agree. But the CIO role has never been more challenging than it is today, with rising operational respo

    February 22, 2017

    Sick of video call technology that make participants look like they're in the witness protection program? Turns out youre not alone. Poor-quality video solutions can give users an unprofessional ap

    February 7, 2017

    Securing voice communications used to be very simple since it was generally a closed system. However, with unified communications (UC) you no longer have the walled protection offered by a dedicate

    February 24, 2017
    UC analyst Blair Pleasant sorts through the myriad cloud architectural models underlying UCaaS and CCaaS offerings, and explains why knowing the differences matter.
    February 17, 2017
    From the most basics of basics to the hidden gotchas, UC consultant Melissa Swartz helps demystify the complex world of SIP trunking.
    February 7, 2017
    UC&C consultant Kevin Kieller, a partner at enableUC, shares pointers for making the right architectural choices for your Skype for Business deployment.
    February 1, 2017
    Elka Popova, a Frost & Sullivan program director, shares a status report on the UCaaS market today and offers her perspective on what large enterprises need before committing to UC in the cloud.
    January 26, 2017
    Andrew Davis, co-founder of Wainhouse Research and chair of the Video track at Enterprise Connect 2017, sorts through the myriad cloud video service options and shares how to tell if your choice is en....
    January 23, 2017
    Sheila McGee-Smith, Contact Center/Customer Experience track chair for Enterprise Connect 2017, tells us what we need to know about the role cloud software is playing in contact centers today.