ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Eric Krapf
Eric Krapf is the Program Co-Chair of the Enterprise Connect events, helping to set program content and direction for the...
Read Full Bio >>
SHARE



Eric Krapf | April 29, 2008 |

 
   

UC Strategy Impacts Today's PBX/ACD Decision

UC Strategy Impacts Today's PBX/ACD Decision This post was written by Jason Alley, lead consultant at Vanguard Communications. Enterprise customers are becoming more aware of Unified Communications (UC) applications and issues. However, I find many still compartmentalize UC as a futures-only consideration that doesn't have much bearing on current PBX/ACD investment decisions. After a recent client engagement, I am convinced every enterprise should be armed with a UC Strategy before making a major PBX/ACD decision. Let's take a closer look at this case study.

This post was written by Jason Alley, lead consultant at Vanguard Communications. Enterprise customers are becoming more aware of Unified Communications (UC) applications and issues. However, I find many still compartmentalize UC as a futures-only consideration that doesn't have much bearing on current PBX/ACD investment decisions. After a recent client engagement, I am convinced every enterprise should be armed with a UC Strategy before making a major PBX/ACD decision. Let's take a closer look at this case study.

This post was written by Jason Alley, lead consultant at Vanguard Communications.

Enterprise customers are becoming more aware of Unified Communications (UC) applications and issues. However, I find many still compartmentalize UC as a futures-only consideration that doesn't have much bearing on current PBX/ACD investment decisions. After a recent client engagement, I am convinced every enterprise should be armed with a UC Strategy before making a major PBX/ACD decision. Let's take a closer look at this case study.Case Study Our team was asked to help develop a Request for Proposal, and work through the selection process, for a PBX/ACD solution meant to address an immediate office expansion and eventual replacement of an aging PBX and problematic ACD system.

The most critical need was to ensure enterprise users occupying new office space had basic dial-tone and voicemail capabilities. The expansion/move was to take place in fairly short order, so there wasn't time to analyze and document business requirements. Purchasing a new PBX (from one of the major suppliers) rather than investing in an aging system seemed to make good sense. Our job was to help make sure whatever system selected would support the needs of the contact center and future enterprise requirements.

A few nuggets of information were uncovered while onsite:

  • The client had conducted UC research and was planning to move to a UC infrastructure offered by a vendor other than the two PBX/ACD suppliers that were under consideration for the current PBX/ACD replacement project. And, this new UC infrastructure would eventually address the company's voice communications needs as well.

  • The existing PBX was capable of meeting the company's basic needs for another three years.

  • The existing ACD system was a good short-to-mid-term (and potentially long term) fit, and most of the issues encountered to-date had to do with design/implementation and the supplier relationship.

  • There were both technical and organizational complexities within the company that prevented a VoIP deployment in the short term.

  • Process optimization and requirements analysis still needed to be done to help the company avoid spending significant money implementing like-for-like functionality. Additional analysis was completed and the team determined purchasing a new PBX/ACD system was not the best answer. Why invest $1M+ in a new PBX/ACD platform that will eventually be replaced by its UC successor?

    In light of this, the team agreed the preferred path forward was to leverage existing infrastructure for the (immediate) office expansion, upgrade and stabilize the existing ACD system and supplier relationship, conduct needed process optimization and requirements analysis to re-define how the company will manage communications and collaboration in the future, and begin a calculated progression with UC (by job type/category) and contact center enhancements. This approach will enable the client to:

  • Meet the immediate needs of the business.
  • Spend today's money smartly, with the future in mind.
  • Enhance the way they do business by having business requirements drive technology decisions (which of course should be driven by corporate strategy and goals).
  • Ready the data network to support future communication needs (e.g., VoIP).
  • Leverage their UC platform of choice to deliver voice capabilities, in addition to instant messaging, presence, click-to-communicate, and a wide range of collaborative tools. This UC infrastructure will eventually replace the existing PBX/VM systems, as products mature and the client becomes more familiar with the technology.
  • Buy time to see how their UC provider will address the company's contact center needs, through partnership and/or other investment activities.

    What started out as a simple PBX/ACD replacement project turned into an interesting case study illustrating why it's critical to have a UC Strategy in place when making today's PBX/ACD purchase decisions. This seems like a no-brainer but, as mentioned above, too often people compartmentalize UC as a futures-only consideration that doesn't have much bearing on current investment decisions. Hopefully this case study will help change perceptions and serve as a call to action.

    Do you have a UC Strategy in place? How has it impacted/validated your PBX/ACD purchase decisions?



  • COMMENTS




    Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

    Single tags

    These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

    <br> Defines a single line break

    <hr> Defines a horizontal line

    Matching tags

    These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

    <a> Defines an anchor

    <b> Defines bold text

    <big> Defines big text

    <blockquote> Defines a long quotation

    <caption> Defines a table caption

    <cite> Defines a citation

    <code> Defines computer code text

    <em> Defines emphasized text

    <fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

    <h1> This is heading 1

    <h2> This is heading 2

    <h3> This is heading 3

    <h4> This is heading 4

    <h5> This is heading 5

    <h6> This is heading 6

    <i> Defines italic text

    <p> Defines a paragraph

    <pre> Defines preformatted text

    <q> Defines a short quotation

    <samp> Defines sample computer code text

    <small> Defines small text

    <span> Defines a section in a document

    <s> Defines strikethrough text

    <strike> Defines strikethrough text

    <strong> Defines strong text

    <sub> Defines subscripted text

    <sup> Defines superscripted text

    <u> Defines underlined text

    Did you know you can style comments using HTML tags and upload your avatar photo? To upload your avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. Once your profile is complete, you may add your avatar photo. (Hide this hint)

    Sign up to the No Jitter email newsletters

    • Catch up with the blogs, features and columns from No Jitter, the online community for the IP communications industry. Each Thursday, we'll send you a synopsis of the high-impact articles, podcasts and other material posted to No Jitter that week, with links for quick access.

    • A quick hit of original analysis by the experts who bring you Enterprise Connect, the leading event in Enterprise Communications & Collaboration. Each Wednesday, this enewsletter delivers to your email box a thought-provoking, objective take on the latest news and trends in the industry.

    Your email address is required for membership. For details about the user information, please read the UBM Privacy Statement

    As an added benefit, would you like to receive relevant 3rd party offers about new products/services and discounted offers via email? Yes

    * = Required Field
    Enterprise Connect Orlando 2012
    Enterprise Connect is proud to announce the following industry leaders will deliver keynote addresses at Enterprise Connect Orlando:
    --Steven J. Bandrowczak, Vice President & General Manager, Avaya Networking
    --OJ Winge, Senior VP/GM,Video & Collaboration, Cisco
    --Kirk Koenigsbauer, Corporate VP, Office Business Group, Microsoft
    --Alistair Rennie, GM, Lotus Software and Collaboration Solutions, IBM Software Group
    Enterprise Connect Webinars
    Wednesday, Nov. 30, 2 PM EST/11 AM PST

    This presentation reviews best practices and tools for implementing data center clouds, including how to pin-point and resolve problems, and minimize cost while maximizing performance and usability.
    Virtual Enterprise Connect
    This in-depth Virtual Event will feature detailed presentations by technology experts who can help you plan your Lync-based UC migration and get the most out of all that Lync has to offer..
    Enterprise Connect Orlando 2012
    The Enterprise Connect conference program has been published! Our confernce is designed with one over-riding objective: To help you make the best decisions as you migrate your enterprise communications and collaboration.
    Trending Now
    Upcoming Events
    February 15, 2012
    For employees away from the office—whether on the go, at a remote location, or telecommuting from home—success depends on connecting the right people with the right information anywhere to a...
    February 1, 2012
    Have your video implementation projects fallen short of your expectations in user satisfaction or utilization? Reaping the benefits depends on not only on selecting the technology, but on careful plan...
    January 18, 2012
    As your enterprise moves into its Unified Communications migration, you’ll need to meet short-, medium- and long-term goals that provide investment protection, return on investment, and real bus...